Kllrnohj wrote:
KermMartian wrote:
Indeed, I'd expect RAM latency to be far and away the limiting factor in memtest's ability to run fast. I'm equally curious what happened.


Latency makes no difference to memtest - it's all about the bandwidth for that.
Excuse my imprecise use of terminology. I'd expect RAM *bandwidth to be far and away the limiting factor in memtest's ability run fast, since sequential reads and writes to RAM such as I assume memtest use accrue negligable sigma latency and CPU time compared with the cost of repeatedly hitting RAM for the reads and writes.
KermMartian wrote:
Excuse my imprecise use of terminology. I'd expect RAM *bandwidth to be far and away the limiting factor in memtest's ability run fast, since se


I assumed that that was what you meant, but you CAN control the latency and timings as well. Some motherboards let you go absolutely crazy with the number of timings you can control, actually.
Kllrnohj wrote:
KermMartian wrote:
Excuse my imprecise use of terminology. I'd expect RAM *bandwidth to be far and away the limiting factor in memtest's ability run fast, since se


I assumed that that was what you meant, but you CAN control the latency and timings as well. Some motherboards let you go absolutely crazy with the number of timings you can control, actually.
Indeed, so I've heard, although I've never personally tried to tune my latency and timings for fear of locking things up irreparably.
KermMartian wrote:
Indeed, so I've heard, although I've never personally tried to tune my latency and timings for fear of locking things up irreparably.


Well, a CMOS clear will usually sort it all back out, but I don't mess with timings because it usually doesn't matter.

But for example, here are some shots of what my motherboard lets me specify:
http://www.hardocp.com/image.html?image=MTIyNDIyMTcwMkZzdWFSeG40SllfMl81X2wuZ2lm
http://www.hardocp.com/image.html?image=MTIyNDIyMTcwMkZzdWFSeG40SllfMl82X2wuZ2lm
http://www.hardocp.com/image.html?image=MTIyNDIyMTcwMkZzdWFSeG40SllfMl83X2wuZ2lm
I like how that first screenshot shows a voltage of 2.46V when the warning right above it says above 1.65V could cause permanent damage. Razz
Ok so I tired another HDD and it still BSOD'd during the install so I'm back to square one. I'll try my other ram chips and see what happens but if that also fails the only thing left would be the processor. I'm doubtful that's the issue and I'm not really sure how I'd test it.

EDIT: Seriously what does the windows installer do that 19hr's of memtest86 doesn't error and yet the install fails on those ram chips...

I put in my old Corsair XMMS2 chips that I bought with my computer in the first place and the install took. I guess I'll be buying a set of 2x1GB chips for my mom's desktop now since I had put my old ones in there.
Wow, that's the strangest thing ever. Sad I'm glad you've finally (hopefully) narrowed it down and solved this.
memtest isn't foolproof. I've seen bad RAM pass memtest before.

A simple re-seat also goes a long way.
Kllrnohj wrote:
memtest isn't foolproof. I've seen bad RAM pass memtest before.

A simple re-seat also goes a long way.
Yeah I tried a re-seat as well, not to mention they were just installed a day or two ago since this Mobo is new under warranty(even though it seems it wasn't the issue).
TheStorm wrote:
Kllrnohj wrote:
memtest isn't foolproof. I've seen bad RAM pass memtest before.

A simple re-seat also goes a long way.
Yeah I tried a re-seat as well, not to mention they were just installed a day or two ago since this Mobo is new under warranty(even though it seems it wasn't the issue).
Indeed, although we thought it would have been. Interesting enough, I noticed that Andy Janata had almost the exact same issue, where some RAM passed memtest but would make things crash often.
I was upgrading a laptop with a second stick of RAM. It would reliably BSOD a couple of minutes after booting and logging into Windows with the new stick in slot B, and BSOD before reaching the login screen if the new stick was the only one in the machine. However, Memtest couldn't find any problems with it. I haven't put much faith in the software since then!
benryves wrote:
I was upgrading a laptop with a second stick of RAM. It would reliably BSOD a couple of minutes after booting and logging into Windows with the new stick in slot B, and BSOD before reaching the login screen if the new stick was the only one in the machine. However, Memtest couldn't find any problems with it. I haven't put much faith in the software since then!
I'm surprised to hear three separate instances of this in as many days; I had always put a lot of faith in memtest as a dependable go/no-go on sticks of RAM. :/ I wonder if it would be possible for the developers to figure out what they're missing, or if it would be hard to replicate.
  
Register to Join the Conversation
Have your own thoughts to add to this or any other topic? Want to ask a question, offer a suggestion, share your own programs and projects, upload a file to the file archives, get help with calculator and computer programming, or simply chat with like-minded coders and tech and calculator enthusiasts via the site-wide AJAX SAX widget? Registration for a free Cemetech account only takes a minute.

» Go to Registration page
Page 3 of 3
» All times are UTC - 5 Hours
 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 

Advertisement