Send/recieveless Chat Prog
This is an archived, read-only copy of the United-TI subforum , including posts and topic from May 2003 to April 2012. If you would like to discuss any of the topics in this forum, you can visit Cemetech's TI-BASIC subforum. Some of these topics may also be directly-linked to active Cemetech topics. If you are a Cemetech member with a linked United-TI account, you can link United-TI topics here with your current Cemetech topics.

This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics. TI-Basic => TI-BASIC
Send/recieveless Chat Prog
United-TI Archives -> TI-Basic
 
    » Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
» View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
tyskis


Member


Joined: 20 Nov 2003
Posts: 238
Posted: 11 Mar 2004 12:53:39 am    Post subject:
Why don't learn the things and spend the $25+ on something more funny Smile
Back to top
Arcane Wizard
`semi-hippie`


Super Elite (Last Title)


Joined: 02 Jun 2003
Posts: 8993
Posted: 11 Mar 2004 10:30:21 am    Post subject:
What would happen if , say.. 6 people used IR links to communicate, wouldn't that mess all the signals up andstuff?
Back to top
tyskis


Member


Joined: 20 Nov 2003
Posts: 238
Posted: 11 Mar 2004 01:22:55 pm    Post subject:
I suppose they would, but that possibility should be rather small Smile
Back to top
Awesome1


Advanced Member


Joined: 28 Jan 2004
Posts: 269
Posted: 11 Mar 2004 04:04:21 pm    Post subject:
Im no wizzard, couldn't you set up different frequences or something? Or have a setting that one sends stronger then the other??? Again, im just a sophmore in highschool, so i dont have a lot of knowledge in that area...
Back to top
Adm.Wiggin
aka Tianon


Know-It-All


Joined: 02 Jun 2003
Posts: 1874
Posted: 11 Mar 2004 06:09:56 pm    Post subject:
Bluefire wrote:
ive been chatting with shane fry (creater of AIM for the calc, a send and recieveless chat prog he made and neways, we are just going to include more feature and work together on his prog, and BTW get( and Send( are for cbl/clr (SP?) but u can use send anyways on ur calc to send a variable to thier calc, but u cant use Get(  Cool

here is this 'receiveless' crap again!

it would be receiving or receivable.

Quote:
I before E except after C


receiveless would mean
Quote:
Inability to receive.
Back to top
Babyboy


Advanced Member


Joined: 11 Jun 2003
Posts: 499
Posted: 11 Mar 2004 08:14:05 pm    Post subject:
i was about ready to cry until adm. and arcane posted! yes, getCalc( is the only way to talk to another calc. Ok, making a program and not cheating is easy, but what about those long lectures in science and geography? i am a chatty person, me and buddies would like that, and if there was a satalite link, we could post in class too! Razz
Back to top
Darth Android
DragonOS Dev Team


Bandwidth Hog


Joined: 31 May 2003
Posts: 2104
Posted: 12 Mar 2004 02:25:47 pm    Post subject:
Arcane Wizard wrote:
What would happen if , say.. 6 people used IR links to communicate, wouldn't that mess all the signals up andstuff?

you could set it up so that when a calc sent anything, it sent its id num then the other calcs check to see if thats the calc it it supposed to be receiving from. or you could have a chat room with 6 ppl :)

and someone here said that you could use send( to send stuff, but get( doesnt work. i thought only getCalc( could communicate calc <-> calc. can anyone clear this up for me, as i dont have a 2nd calc with me to test Sad
Back to top
tyskis


Member


Joined: 20 Nov 2003
Posts: 238
Posted: 12 Mar 2004 02:28:42 pm    Post subject:
I think Get( AND Send( worked between my TI83-Plus and another TI83-Plus, but i'm not sure. Razz
Back to top
Darth Android
DragonOS Dev Team


Bandwidth Hog


Joined: 31 May 2003
Posts: 2104
Posted: 12 Mar 2004 02:36:02 pm    Post subject:
i have had problems with get(, but if they do i would like to know. i may be able to find out this afternoon.

do they work even when the calc isnt in wait mode?
Back to top
tyskis


Member


Joined: 20 Nov 2003
Posts: 238
Posted: 12 Mar 2004 03:03:31 pm    Post subject:
If they work, they work without waitmode.
Back to top
Arcane Wizard
`semi-hippie`


Super Elite (Last Title)


Joined: 02 Jun 2003
Posts: 8993
Posted: 12 Mar 2004 03:23:11 pm    Post subject:
I'm sure they don't work on the regular Ti83.
Back to top
DarkerLine
ceci n'est pas une |


Super Elite (Last Title)


Joined: 04 Nov 2003
Posts: 8328
Posted: 12 Mar 2004 05:28:07 pm    Post subject:
I'd think TI would say so in the manual if they worked.
Back to top
Arcane Wizard
`semi-hippie`


Super Elite (Last Title)


Joined: 02 Jun 2003
Posts: 8993
Posted: 12 Mar 2004 05:53:04 pm    Post subject:
Yeah, I suppose.

BTW, oh neat, those two latin lines from Monty Python and the Holy Grail, could you translate it?
Back to top
Adm.Wiggin
aka Tianon


Know-It-All


Joined: 02 Jun 2003
Posts: 1874
Posted: 12 Mar 2004 05:57:19 pm    Post subject:
actually, those latin lines are spelled wrong. oh well.

about the manual telling you, do they tell you that the other calc has to be in wait mode for getCalc( to work? NO! stupid TI, we should write a *real* manual Wink
Back to top
Babyboy


Advanced Member


Joined: 11 Jun 2003
Posts: 499
Posted: 12 Mar 2004 10:41:58 pm    Post subject:
yes getcalc( is the only way to comm between calc to calc!!!


doesn't the calcs have to be paused? if not it would help my 2player...
Back to top
Bluefire


Member


Joined: 18 Jan 2004
Posts: 186
Posted: 12 Mar 2004 11:19:14 pm    Post subject:
NO GETCALC( IS NOT THE ONLY WAY! Send( works too for calc to calc communication but not Get(!!!! if you do not beleive me go look at the code of shane fry's AIM Chat Laughing
Back to top
X1011
10100111001


Active Member


Joined: 14 Nov 2003
Posts: 657
Posted: 13 Mar 2004 12:23:06 am    Post subject:
Does that program work?
Back to top
Bluefire


Member


Joined: 18 Jan 2004
Posts: 186
Posted: 13 Mar 2004 12:40:32 am    Post subject:
yes that program does work (very well i might add) it has been updated since the screenshots and also looks alot better
Back to top
DarkerLine
ceci n'est pas une |


Super Elite (Last Title)


Joined: 04 Nov 2003
Posts: 8328
Posted: 13 Mar 2004 12:37:53 pm    Post subject:
Calm down, I do not think GetCalc is enough to start shouting your heads off.

Does Send( require a pause (if it does work)?
Back to top
Adm.Wiggin
aka Tianon


Know-It-All


Joined: 02 Jun 2003
Posts: 1874
Posted: 13 Mar 2004 07:01:14 pm    Post subject:
I would think that Send( replaces the pause needed for GetCalc(, but i may be wrong (prolly Laughing)
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Register to Join the Conversation
Have your own thoughts to add to this or any other topic? Want to ask a question, offer a suggestion, share your own programs and projects, upload a file to the file archives, get help with calculator and computer programming, or simply chat with like-minded coders and tech and calculator enthusiasts via the site-wide AJAX SAX widget? Registration for a free Cemetech account only takes a minute.

» Go to Registration page
Send/recieveless Chat Prog
    » Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
» View previous topic :: View next topic  
Page 2 of 3 » All times are UTC - 5 Hours

 

Advertisement