This is an archived, read-only copy of the United-TI subforum , including posts and topic from May 2003 to April 2012. If you would like to discuss any of the topics in this forum, you can visit Cemetech's Calculator Hardware, Electronics, Robotics subforum. Some of these topics may also be directly-linked to active Cemetech topics. If you are a Cemetech member with a linked United-TI account, you can link United-TI topics here with your current Cemetech topics.

This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics. Calculator Modifications => Calculator Hardware, Electronics, Robotics
Author Message
DigiTan
Unregistered HyperCam 2


Super Elite (Last Title)


Joined: 10 Nov 2003
Posts: 4468

Posted: 24 Apr 2004 06:18:13 pm    Post subject:

The TV Code-learner/IR link project has hit an unexpected snag. So far, I've been using a Radio Shack IR detector to receiver IR signals. It's been working pretty good until recently. I think it might have something to do with a pair of decoupling capacitors I have between the timing crystal and the ground plane (probably using the wrong value). Recently, I ran low on capactors, so I've been using a different type. I'll try buying more of the usual type today.

Anyway--if it works--the whole thing will be ~slightly smaller than those remotes they use for car alarms. This *might* be small enough to fit inside the original casing--just behind the LCD. (No promises yet)

[edit] Found the problem. The microcontroller was introducing too much noise to the IR detector.


Last edited by Guest on 27 Apr 2004 04:51:08 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
Keith Pierce


Advanced Member


Joined: 02 Feb 2004
Posts: 411

Posted: 27 Apr 2004 12:58:04 pm    Post subject:

I need some information on a idea i got. Maybe the idea was already brought up or even made but is it possible to make the infra-red links connect directly to the link port.

Another thing is how do i go along on making my calc (83+/SE) have a light?
Back to top
NextPerception


Member


Joined: 08 Sep 2003
Posts: 203

Posted: 27 Apr 2004 06:24:51 pm    Post subject:

Keith Pierce wrote:
I need some information on a idea i got. Maybe the idea was already brought up or even made but is it possible to make the infra-red links connect directly to the link port.

Another thing is how do i go along on making my calc (83+/SE) have a light?


Oh I had assumed that was implied.
I believe that has already been brought up with the issue of designing an in calc or external version. any external version would need to be controled by the link port with a program.

about the light...
you simply hook a couple leds up to a battery and a switch and design it so it can sit next to your calculator and have it shine on the screen


Last edited by Guest on 27 Apr 2004 06:27:23 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
DigiTan
Unregistered HyperCam 2


Super Elite (Last Title)


Joined: 10 Nov 2003
Posts: 4468

Posted: 27 Apr 2004 07:02:12 pm    Post subject:

Keith Pierce wrote:
I need some information on a idea i got. Maybe the idea was already brought up or even made but is it possible to make the infra-red links connect directly to the link port.

The direct-connect LED designs aren't very good at refining the InfraRed signal for a few reasons..

When your TV remote or PDA sends a signal to an applicance, it has to combine the data with a 38KHz carrier wave (AM radio uses this strategy too). The purpose of this is to make the IR signal distinguishable from extraneous IR noise-makers that don't produce that carrier (lamps, candles, and even animals). When the data arrives at the receiver, it passes through a high-pass filter which drops any signal that doesn't have the same carrier. A second filter removes the 38KHz pulses a restores the original signal.

The extra receiver equipment also helps provide cleaner logic signals and prevents amplifier feedback if the transmitter is too close (just like in sound equipment). Wink
Back to top
Keith Pierce


Advanced Member


Joined: 02 Feb 2004
Posts: 411

Posted: 28 Apr 2004 07:14:26 am    Post subject:

Thanks guys that helped alot.
Back to top
Awesome1


Advanced Member


Joined: 28 Jan 2004
Posts: 269

Posted: 30 Apr 2004 08:39:58 pm    Post subject:

These wireless links are very interesting to me. I would like to make one but i have no experience in electronics nor are very good at soldering. If you were to finish the design, how much would u charge to have one made for someone including a few programs that could be used with it like wireless chat and wireless games?
Back to top
NextPerception


Member


Joined: 08 Sep 2003
Posts: 203

Posted: 02 May 2004 05:30:39 pm    Post subject:

I wonder if you could make a small thing that could somehow use the am radio waves the calculator puts out for very short range linkless comunications between calculators. (if you don't know what I am talking about hold your calculator next to a am radiop on a empty am station then do something on the calculator outside any asm programs and you get different sounds by doing different processes.)

Last edited by Guest on 02 May 2004 05:30:54 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
X1011
10100111001


Active Member


Joined: 14 Nov 2003
Posts: 657

Posted: 17 May 2004 08:42:34 pm    Post subject:

I can hardly even hear that, maybe it's my radio, but I don't think they're much use.
Back to top
DigiTan
Unregistered HyperCam 2


Super Elite (Last Title)


Joined: 10 Nov 2003
Posts: 4468

Posted: 17 May 2004 11:18:48 pm    Post subject:

It's possible but it would be very, very, very hard. Almost Sci-Fi hard. There's a (mostly fictional) technique called Van Eck hacking that could be used to reconstruct the processor signals. It's tough because you have thousands of other signals mixed in, and you have to collect and isolate this radiation in a super-precise manner. There are rumors that the NSA has a working Van Eck system, but there's no public proof of it. Evil or Very Mad

Anyway, there are some cool RF-based microchips out on the market now that are small enough to fit inside the calculator without any external parts.
Back to top
Adm.Wiggin
aka Tianon


Know-It-All


Joined: 02 Jun 2003
Posts: 1874

Posted: 18 May 2004 05:06:53 pm    Post subject:

I can't help but laugh when I see the NSA website Laughing I find it very humorous that they think they "make" and "break" all the codes.
Back to top
DarkerLine
ceci n'est pas une |


Super Elite (Last Title)


Joined: 04 Nov 2003
Posts: 8328

Posted: 18 May 2004 05:07:58 pm    Post subject:

Some codes really can't be broken. Without the key.
Back to top
Adm.Wiggin
aka Tianon


Know-It-All


Joined: 02 Jun 2003
Posts: 1874

Posted: 18 May 2004 05:24:34 pm    Post subject:

And then there is hashing (like md5 Smile)
Back to top
Raster


Active Member


Joined: 17 May 2004
Posts: 529

Posted: 18 May 2004 07:02:33 pm    Post subject:

Well with the TI wireless link couldnt we use ultrasound? We could use a MC14457 ultrasonic/IR transmitter and the MC14458 ultrasonic/IR receiver. and if we cant It does IR also.

I have no site for info about it, but its still around and I can scan in some docs about it. from a mag. Oh and its a CMOS chip just for a little info.
Back to top
DigiTan
Unregistered HyperCam 2


Super Elite (Last Title)


Joined: 10 Nov 2003
Posts: 4468

Posted: 18 May 2004 07:18:06 pm    Post subject:

Ultrasound might work. (Some of the earliest TV remotes in the 70's used to use ultrasound. There are still a few problem though, becuase of basic acoustic interferences (echos, ghosting, cancellation, and old fashion noise). Many engineers would conclude that sound is probably to worst medium for data. Audible tones would be even worse, but ultrasound is still a possibility.
Back to top
NextPerception


Member


Joined: 08 Sep 2003
Posts: 203

Posted: 19 May 2004 08:10:14 pm    Post subject:

wow thats a unique idea. Me thinks that may have some problems and besides, the ultra sound stuff is expensive and complex. (and I smell digital electronics Mad me no likes to make digital things, me like the analog)

what if we wan't to use it in space though?
sorry corny joke couldn't help myself though... Neutral
Back to top
Raster


Active Member


Joined: 17 May 2004
Posts: 529

Posted: 20 May 2004 04:29:26 pm    Post subject:

Well ultrasound is analog but most of us are probably going to be in school where the teachers are like SHUT THE F@CK UP so itll be quiet and you can chat from a pritty good distance if your in the same room. Very Happy
Back to top
Raster


Active Member


Joined: 17 May 2004
Posts: 529

Posted: 20 May 2004 04:36:40 pm    Post subject:

Actually let me experiment with ultrasound (if I have the stuff or radio shack, stupid radio shack probably doesnt even have an ultrasonic transducer Neutral )
Back to top
wrigley


Advanced Member


Joined: 19 May 2004
Posts: 399

Posted: 21 May 2004 04:59:03 am    Post subject:

Ultrasound might not be the best idea. I have an ultrasound controlled stereo. The remote works perfectly, but if you drop a set of keys on the table, the stereo just might start playing song number 5 on disc 3, or turn up/down the volume.

So ultrasound could *easily* work to send/receive messages, the trouble is sending a message could be done by virtually anything with no control over what is being sent (eg the situation with the keys).
Back to top
NextPerception


Member


Joined: 08 Sep 2003
Posts: 203

Posted: 22 May 2004 12:01:04 am    Post subject:

well if what your saying is true and keys dropping on the floor can cause it to do something I have an IDEA!!! (we need idea~lightbulb smiley face for right here)
have a link activation code. in a format perhaps something like this.

-recieving-calc-id=calc u want to send to
-breaker signal
-1234=represents a series of sound telling the reciever to listen and transmit if all the following data is correctly sent
-breaker signal
-28020.29000 =frequency of the transmision in Hz (min hz.max hz)
-breaker signal
-20 =increments of used frequencys (in this case the used frequencies would be 28030,
28050, 28070, and 28090)
-breaker signal
-720 =length of transmision in bytes
-breaker signal
-wait for one of three responses (if repeat signal is heard then repeat /if continue signal is heard, continue/ if no signal is heard repeat for how ever many times is set in the options then stop trying and report failed transmission to the user)
-assuming continue is heard then send data now
-ask other calc if repeat is required if ans=yes continue else repeat
-end transmission signal
so the final data transmission activation code would be (note-breaker signals will be represented by a "." (no quotes))
recieving-calc-id.1234.28020.29000.20.720

this can probably be refined a little bit but I have decided to name this the DTAC (data transmission activation code) version 0.1
I named it because I can.
Back to top
michael816


Newbie


Joined: 21 Sep 2004
Posts: 3

Posted: 21 Sep 2004 10:08:43 pm    Post subject:

Hey I saw this topic and decided to register, so I can post and help/get help from you guys. So this IP Link thing... has anyone done it yet? I have bought a emitter/detector from radio shack and (stupidly) thought I could just cut open a link cable and connect the wires... well I learned its more complacated than that. So if anyone has done it yet... PLEASE show us some pictures of the finished product and a nice procedure on how to do it. Thanks in advance, Michael816.

PS: This ultra sound thing doesnt "sound" very good because, from what I've heard, any slight sound could mess it up... but thats just my opion, i could be wrong.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Register to Join the Conversation
Have your own thoughts to add to this or any other topic? Want to ask a question, offer a suggestion, share your own programs and projects, upload a file to the file archives, get help with calculator and computer programming, or simply chat with like-minded coders and tech and calculator enthusiasts via the site-wide AJAX SAX widget? Registration for a free Cemetech account only takes a minute.

» Go to Registration page
    » Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
» View previous topic :: View next topic  
Page 5 of 6 » All times are UTC - 5 Hours

 

Advertisement