Author |
Message |
|
Jedd 1980 Pong World Champion
Elite
Joined: 18 Nov 2003 Posts: 823
|
Posted: 14 Jan 2004 05:55:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well then my chem teacher was an idiot. (she was, actually) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DarkerLine ceci n'est pas une |
Super Elite (Last Title)
Joined: 04 Nov 2003 Posts: 8328
|
Posted: 14 Jan 2004 05:57:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
That is a general statement that applies to all chemistry teachers. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
shadowing Powered by 64
Calc Guru
Joined: 06 Jan 2004 Posts: 1002
|
Posted: 14 Jan 2004 08:23:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hey I don't get this. What's all this jargon about atoms supposed to explain? Something about space? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Jedd 1980 Pong World Champion
Elite
Joined: 18 Nov 2003 Posts: 823
|
Posted: 14 Jan 2004 09:34:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yes. Since matter (you/me/etc) is an important part of our universe (understatement) its important to know what they are, what they do, how they are put together, etc. Also, since we are running out of fossil fuels, its very likely that our generation will need to come up with a new power source. It's looking like nuclear fusion is the way to go. That's why it's important to be educated on the topic. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
shadowing Powered by 64
Calc Guru
Joined: 06 Jan 2004 Posts: 1002
|
Posted: 14 Jan 2004 10:35:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Don't blame me. I don't understand this because I'm in junior high. Anyway, what will be our next source of power? Solar? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Jedd 1980 Pong World Champion
Elite
Joined: 18 Nov 2003 Posts: 823
|
Posted: 14 Jan 2004 10:52:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Maybe. But I think fusion has the most potential. Ironically enough, the sun is constantly fusing hydrogen, which is what creates the energy that creates light. So technically, solar power came from the same place. The idea behind fusion is not to break apart atoms (like fission and atom bombs) but to press (fuse) them together. It's way more cleaner and can be disposed of easily (with the right care). For an anology, a few drops of water (yes, even salt water) has enough hydrogen to produce the same amount of energy as 150 gallons of gasoline. Oceans would become an endless supply of fuel. Heck, boats could go forever.
Last edited by Guest on 14 Jan 2004 10:54:09 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Arcane Wizard `semi-hippie`
Super Elite (Last Title)
Joined: 02 Jun 2003 Posts: 8993
|
Posted: 15 Jan 2004 05:59:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sir Robin wrote: You can also think of neutrinos as waves.
You can think of all particles as waves, ever heard of quantum mechanics?
Quote: That is a general statement that applies to all chemistry teachers. Maybe to all the chem teachers you've had or know, the one I have actually knows what he's taling about and is quite a good teacher.
Quote: Anyway, what will be our next source of power? Solar? Quote: Maybe. Solar power can't be the next source of power, we're already using it, and it quite sucks too. It's highly inefficient.
But I agree about fusion, all we have to do is figure out how to do it savely (without the whole powerplant exploding and stuff ) and we'll be on our way.
Last edited by Guest on 15 Jan 2004 09:42:28 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
62 52 53 53 Formerly known as 62 52 53 53
Active Member
Joined: 30 May 2003 Posts: 607
|
Posted: 15 Jan 2004 04:00:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
antually, solar IS getting more efficient. All you need is some curved mirrors, a high-quality sterling engine, and a generator. much more efficient than photocells, and lasts longer too, since the production of electricity doesen't rely on breaking the molecules apart.
And fusion will only work if we can use less than 150 gallons of gasoline to make hydrogen fuse. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Jedd 1980 Pong World Champion
Elite
Joined: 18 Nov 2003 Posts: 823
|
Posted: 15 Jan 2004 05:45:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Solar is a great alternative when you are in a place with no source of electricity. At a research center in Belize that I go to a lot they run comepletely off of solar. It powers the water pumps, lights, water heaters, cooking equipment, etc. However I agree with Arcane that it doesn't do much good for powering cities and normal uses. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DigiTan Unregistered HyperCam 2
Super Elite (Last Title)
Joined: 10 Nov 2003 Posts: 4468
|
Posted: 15 Jan 2004 06:29:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I don't know the topic got here, but as long as we're discussing energy, you might say geothermal power might also be useful on Mars, especially with the diminished sunlight. Perhaps if the rovers can uncover some volcanic activity, we might move one step closer to colonizing the Red Planet. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
shadowing Powered by 64
Calc Guru
Joined: 06 Jan 2004 Posts: 1002
|
Posted: 15 Jan 2004 06:38:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Maybe instead of solar as it was regarded almost as nothing, fusion could replace it, but possibly, we may even use waves as a source of energy. Correct me if I'm wrong. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DarkerLine ceci n'est pas une |
Super Elite (Last Title)
Joined: 04 Nov 2003 Posts: 8328
|
Posted: 15 Jan 2004 06:56:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
How exactly would you use waves as a source of energy? what waves? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sgm
Calc Guru
Joined: 04 Sep 2003 Posts: 1265
|
Posted: 15 Jan 2004 06:57:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Do you mean using the motion of the tides to run a generator? There are very few places on earth where that is feasible. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DarkerLine ceci n'est pas une |
Super Elite (Last Title)
Joined: 04 Nov 2003 Posts: 8328
|
Posted: 15 Jan 2004 06:59:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
And it isn't feasible on mars at all, so I doubt that is what he meant. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Jedd 1980 Pong World Champion
Elite
Joined: 18 Nov 2003 Posts: 823
|
Posted: 15 Jan 2004 08:05:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Mars Update:
Well as you guys may have seen, the US is planning on building a station on the moon as a rest stop for future Mars astronauts. My first thought was it's pointless because the moon is a short hop compared to Mars, but the reasoning behind it is for use as a re-fueling station. It takes a lot of fuel for a shuttle to leave the Earth's atmosphere, so being able to start on their mission to Mars with a full tank would be a huge advantage. I believe this is a great idea, and we should build it, but the US really should be thinking about other things we can do with our money. Although it's difficult to say, Mars can wait. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
shadowing Powered by 64
Calc Guru
Joined: 06 Jan 2004 Posts: 1002
|
Posted: 15 Jan 2004 11:14:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think it's useless. What I meant by waves is waves like gamma. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Jedd 1980 Pong World Champion
Elite
Joined: 18 Nov 2003 Posts: 823
|
Posted: 15 Jan 2004 11:57:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Gamma rays are even more useless for making energy. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
62 52 53 53 Formerly known as 62 52 53 53
Active Member
Joined: 30 May 2003 Posts: 607
|
Posted: 16 Jan 2004 06:34:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Besides, I still count gama as light. It's all electro-magnetic radiation anyway. instead of waves, you could try 'radiation.' |
|
Back to top |
|
|
shadowing Powered by 64
Calc Guru
Joined: 06 Jan 2004 Posts: 1002
|
Posted: 16 Jan 2004 06:34:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I get the point. If rays can't be used, what other sources of energy besides fusion and solar be used? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Arcane Wizard `semi-hippie`
Super Elite (Last Title)
Joined: 02 Jun 2003 Posts: 8993
|
Posted: 17 Jan 2004 03:38:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
62 52 53 53 wrote: Besides, I still count gama as light. It's all electro-magnetic radiation anyway. instead of waves, you could try 'radiation.'
Light exists of radiation and fotons, which are released when electrons jump from the core of an atom to other electron layers and back, or between jumps to a different electron layer and back. I forgot if this could be done with gamma rays, but doubt it. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|