TiFreak8x wrote:
You should also join some of our web rings...
Basic Elite
TI-Freakware's web ring
Look at the bottom of the front page...
KermMartian wrote:
Yeah, I'm in the four most useful of the TI webrings.
Kllrnohj wrote:
eh, nah. I ain't into the whole 'webring' thing - they just take up space
rivereye wrote:
ok
btw, what about the TI Graphing Calculator Web Ring?
Sorry, I just can't stop laughing to myself about that. 
rofl jon - was it really necessary to quote the 4 posts
thats pretty cold
It seems like something out of slapstick comedy.
Anyway, KllrSoft....pretty cool. It should be more than just calculators, though. Perhaps Python resources as well?
Jonathan_Pezzino wrote:
It seems like something out of slapstick comedy.
Anyway, KllrSoft....pretty cool. It should be more than just calculators, though. Perhaps Python resources as well?
it'll also be the home of my C++ and Python programs, too. Hence gcnX being there 
(although, i guess you COULD argue thats calculators...but oh well)
What is the difference between HTML, XML, and XHTML?
Jonathan_Pezzino wrote:
What is the difference between HTML, XML, and XHTML?
XHTML is the replacement (proposed) for HTML, it is a combination of XML and HTML, and will use the much strictor XML rules in an attempt to elemenate "tag soup" (did you know using <tables> to create the side panes and such is considered wrong, and therefore "tag soup"? which, according to the w3, means that this site is complete crap from an HTML standpoint, CSS is supposed to be used instead of tables for page layout)
XML is more specialized or something like that (wikipedia has good articles on XHTML and XML, look there)
So XHTML depends on CSS(2) for formatting rather than tables?
Jonathan_Pezzino wrote:
So XHTML depends on CSS(2) for formatting rather than tables?
technically, so does HTML - the current widespread use of tables in HTML is mostly incorrect. Table is meant for tabular data, not page layout
XHTML also uses /> for the ends of tags as I understand it?
Jonathan_Pezzino wrote:
XHTML also uses /> for the ends of tags as I understand it?
the /> is a self-ending. HTML spec requires things like images and br's to have closing tags (like <br></br> or <img></img>) - even if the content between them is empty and meaningless. the /> would be the same as the normal </tag> ending, only it makes more sense to use it for things like imgs and br's, since nothing goes between the opening and closing tags of those
the reason you dont' see it in HTML but you do in XHTML and XML is that XHTML and XML are much, much more strict with things like that (technically, when a browser encounters and error in XML or XHTML it is supposed to not display anything...)
ok, at my post, I wasn't trying to get him to join, you don't want to know what went through my head at that time, and I did read the post before posting.
As for the XHTML/HTML w3schools.com is also a good place to get that kind of info. I, for some weird reason, am currently in use of HTML 4.01 transitional for my web page (but Kerm's BE script keeps if from being valid)
huh? My logo prevents it from being valid??
the ampersand in it (not very much liked by the validator, run my page through it and see.
replace it with & then.
Register to Join the Conversation
Have your own thoughts to add to this or any other topic? Want to ask a question, offer a suggestion, share your own programs and projects, upload a file to the file archives, get help with calculator and computer programming, or simply chat with like-minded coders and tech and calculator enthusiasts via the site-wide AJAX SAX widget? Registration for a free Cemetech account only takes a minute.
»
Go to Registration page
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
