So, I don't get why that equals zero. Wouldn't that centre equation be -3? X can't equal all those numerals...

We have a test next week and the teacher didn't take time to make sure I understood.
That is because when you multiply two things and get zero, one or both of the numbers must be zero. Then you set up two equations and solve each one, like it says in your picture.
Souvik is completely correct. Think about it this way: A*0 = 0. A*B*C*D*E*F*0 = 0. Agreed? Now, say you have:

(x-a)(x-b) = 0

For this to equal zero, by the same logic, either (x-a) = 0 or (x-b) = 0 (or both), right? So x-a=0 -> x=a is one possibility, or x-b=0 ->x=b is the other possibility. Now we'll try plugging them in. x=a on the top line, x=b on the bottom line:

(a-a)(a-b) = 0*(a-b) = 0
(b-a)(b-b) = (b-a)*0 = 0

Both seem correct, agree? And the more parentheses you have, the more possible X values.
But, when you substitute 0 for X in (x-1)(x+3) you get (0-1)(0+3), and when you multiply the -1 and 3 by 'FOILing,' you get -3...
comicIDIOT wrote:
But, when you substitute 0 for X in (x-1)(x+3) you get (0-1)(0+3), and when you multiply the -1 and 3 by 'FOILing,' you get -3...
But zero isn't a solution to (X-1)(X+3) = 0, is it? X+3 = 0 or X-1 = 0 are solutions, ie, X={-3,1} are the solutions.
So, I'm basically using the wrong method to solve the equation?
comicIDIOT wrote:
So, I'm basically using the wrong method to solve the equation?
I'm not sure what method you're using. Say I give you this and tell you to solve for X; what do you do?

(X+5)(X-1)(X+2) = 0
I can't say how I'd do that.

But from what I've read above X can equal -5, +1 or -2; {-5,1,-2}.

In the prior problem, I was FOILing: First Outer Inner Last. So, (x-1)(x+3) would be x^2+2x-3 which would be 0^2+2(0)-3.
Correct on the first part, wrong on the second. x^2+2X-3 would not be 0^2+2(0)-3, because X=0 was not a solution. The whole EQUATION = 0 was a solution, in other words x^2+2x-3 = 0.

x^2+2x-3 = 0 where x=1: (1)^2+2(1)-3 = 1+2-3 = 0 (checks out)
x^2+2x-3 = 0 where X=-3: (-3)^2 + 2(-3)-3 = 9-6-3 = 0 (checks out)
So, we don't "FOIL" for these equations then? I was under the impression we were suppose to since the previous section (5.6) was about FOILing & Grouping, mainly. Now, we have this in 5.7.
comicIDIOT wrote:
So, we don't "FOIL" for these equations then? I was under the impression we were suppose to since the previous section (5.6) was about FOILing & Grouping, mainly. Now, we have this in 5.7.
The solutions are equally accurate whether you foil or don't, but it's easier to solve them if you convert to parenthetical form. Wouldn't you agree it's easier to see that -3 is a root from (x-1)(x+3)=0 than from x^2+2x-3=0?
  
Register to Join the Conversation
Have your own thoughts to add to this or any other topic? Want to ask a question, offer a suggestion, share your own programs and projects, upload a file to the file archives, get help with calculator and computer programming, or simply chat with like-minded coders and tech and calculator enthusiasts via the site-wide AJAX SAX widget? Registration for a free Cemetech account only takes a minute.

» Go to Registration page
Page 1 of 1
» All times are UTC - 5 Hours
 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 

Advertisement