Good stuff so far. Nice job on finding that bug. 
KermMartian wrote:
Good stuff so far. Nice job on finding that bug.
There's been plenty of others. It just so happens that they're getting harder to spot (The GUI does a nice job of masking the tell-tale traceback...)
http://sourceforge.net/projects/t83/
0.0.08a released. One beta tester pointed out how slow decimal exponents were, so that (and ln, log, roots) has been fixed. The parser bug from 0.0.07a has since been fixed.
Be sure to thank gscm for the installer. wxPython is bundled in the current installer, although there should be another version coming shortly for those that already have an updated version of wxPython.
0.0.08a released. One beta tester pointed out how slow decimal exponents were, so that (and ln, log, roots) has been fixed. The parser bug from 0.0.07a has since been fixed.
Be sure to thank gscm for the installer. wxPython is bundled in the current installer, although there should be another version coming shortly for those that already have an updated version of wxPython.
http://sourceforge.net/projects/t83/
0.0.09a released. I tested all the math library functions (that the parser can recognize) and make sure they didn't totally crash and burn. In the case that I missed a spot, I've added a small bit of error handling.
If you happen to see something vaguely along the lines of
Code:
please let me know, unless it comments "Invalid Function".
Please let me know if there's anything in the GUI or syntax that you'd like to change. My goal is to make 0.0.10a stable enough that I can release a limited-feature beta.
0.0.09a released. I tested all the math library functions (that the parser can recognize) and make sure they didn't totally crash and burn. In the case that I missed a spot, I've added a small bit of error handling.
If you happen to see something vaguely along the lines of
Code:
(<class exceptions.TypeError at 0x2aaaaaafb1d0>, "unsupported operand type(s) for *: 'TIReal' and 'NotImplementedType'")Please let me know if there's anything in the GUI or syntax that you'd like to change. My goal is to make 0.0.10a stable enough that I can release a limited-feature beta.
http://sourceforge.net/projects/t83/
No one complained, so I didn't change a terrible ton. It's a release, and probably a more stable one. If there's no big issue, I'll release it unchanged as 0.01.0b
[ edit ]
One thing that did change was the release system. If you run windows, look closely at what's there; the regular installer doesn't handle wxPython anymore.
No one complained, so I didn't change a terrible ton. It's a release, and probably a more stable one. If there's no big issue, I'll release it unchanged as 0.01.0b
[ edit ]
One thing that did change was the release system. If you run windows, look closely at what's there; the regular installer doesn't handle wxPython anymore.
http://sourceforge.net/projects/t83/
One person commented, and the changes suggested are a little more than minor tweaks. No change for the first beta, but it seems to be stable. If you downloaded 0.0.10a, don't bother downloading 0.01.00b; I renamed the first to get the second.
One person commented, and the changes suggested are a little more than minor tweaks. No change for the first beta, but it seems to be stable. If you downloaded 0.0.10a, don't bother downloading 0.01.00b; I renamed the first to get the second.
Yay, you finally reached the beta stage of T83. Does this mean that you have most of your features implemented, based on what you said the term "beta" meant to you personally?
he does not. Basically right now, it is just an alternate to the scientific mode of the Windows Calc.
I am the eye of the river
>(<')
>(<')
KermMartian wrote:
Yay, you finally reached the beta stage of T83. Does this mean that you have most of your features implemented, based on what you said the term "beta" meant to you personally?
I changed my definition so I could distinguish between states of reliability
proegssilb wrote:
KermMartian wrote:
Yay, you finally reached the beta stage of T83. Does this mean that you have most of your features implemented, based on what you said the term "beta" meant to you personally?
I changed my definition so I could distinguish between states of reliability
KermMartian wrote:
Ah, still works for me. You're extremely conservative with your version numbers though. This would imply that you are 998 versions away from 1.0, wouldn't it?
My math says 980; 98 in the middle, 10 per middle. But you noticed I didn't use all 99 alpha versions to get to 0.01.00b...
proegssilb wrote:
KermMartian wrote:
Ah, still works for me. You're extremely conservative with your version numbers though. This would imply that you are 998 versions away from 1.0, wouldn't it?
My math says 980; 98 in the middle, 10 per middle. But you noticed I didn't use all 99 alpha versions to get to 0.01.00b...
Register to Join the Conversation
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Advertisement