kirb wrote:
Under z80 assembly? I don't think Chipmaster would mistakingly put it here...
I always just go to the "Go to the new posts" link - I don't pay attention to what forum section it is in.
I always just go to the "Go to the new posts" link - I don't pay attention to what forum section it is in.
What about how at the top of every page, including the View Topic, View Subforum, and Post Reply pages, it has this?
Cemetech Forum Index -> z80 Assembly
To tell you the truth, though, I too often pay no attention to the little details such as that.
Cemetech Forum Index -> z80 Assembly
To tell you the truth, though, I too often pay no attention to the little details such as that.
Well, that makes sense, since those are the forums that you need to pay particular attention to. Perhaps there should be something that alerts you to which subforum you're in? I don't exactly know how, but it would be something to think about.
I just go though each forum and click all the new post links. I don't know why I do that over "View New Posts" dispite it eating up RAM and such, I just do.
I always click the Go to the New Posts, link, start at the bottom, and keep clicking the bottom one until I've answered all the posts I want to answer.
OMG! Kerm was wrong, 0x5 <_<
Seriously though, what went wrong?
Seriously though, what went wrong?
Any fool can use a computer. Many do.
I have no idea (that's why I'm continuing to follow up on this), the calc just froze up and I pressed clear, and then there was a ram reset. I wish I could debug the physical calculator...stupid TI and there inconsistencies. Kerm, any ideas?
KermMartian wrote:
Well, that makes sense, since those are the forums that you need to pay particular attention to. Perhaps there should be something that alerts you to which subforum you're in? I don't exactly know how, but it would be something to think about.
add it to the page title.
I know this is necroposting, but I think I know what crashes it. The executable code is copied from the program to $9D95, while temporarily deleting it from the original program. When you bjump CmdForceNoChar (or whatever it is) it exits without copying back into the original program. (I looked for myself in Calcsys). How could we avoid that? :/
Just call QuitToShell in Doors CS. It will fix the stack, copy the program back, do writeback if necessary, then return to the desktop.
*sigh* Oh yeah, you're right about that. Well, just have your program copy itself back first then...
I'm very new to Z80 asm. Can someone help me with this prolly simple/stupid question? When i try to compile this in z80asm:
ld hl,$966e
ld (hl),' '
push hl
pop de
inc de
ld bc,127
ldir
bjump(_jforceCmdNoChar)
I get:
tiasm.asm:8: command or comment expected (was bjump(_jforceCmdNoChar)))
as the only error. Thanks
ld hl,$966e
ld (hl),' '
push hl
pop de
inc de
ld bc,127
ldir
bjump(_jforceCmdNoChar)
I get:
tiasm.asm:8: command or comment expected (was bjump(_jforceCmdNoChar)))
as the only error. Thanks
Maybe you didn't define the bjump macro (because bjump isn't normally something built-in, you know). Kerm or somebody else could probably elaborate from there....
TI-Connect kills your calculator - switch to TiLP
http://bfr.tifreakware.net - Basic Elite Member - 2B || !2B - chemistry (and general science and math) forums
Register to Join the Conversation
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Advertisement