| Author |
Message |
|
fooe213
Newbie
Joined: 27 Oct 2003
Posts: 6
|
 Posted: 29 Oct 2003 09:27:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I was just wondering what programming language is the TI-BASIC for the Voyage 200. I have heard that teh TI-89 is in C, so i was wondering if the Voyage 200 was C++ or something liek that. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
sgm
Calc Guru
Joined: 04 Sep 2003
Posts: 1265
|
| Posted: 29 Oct 2003 09:36:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Any calculator with a model number >= 89 uses the MC68000 processor. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
b__
Member
Joined: 16 Jun 2003
Posts: 173
|
| Posted: 29 Oct 2003 09:48:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I dont have one, but i know that it has basic just like the 83, and it has assembly that can be programmed in c. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
fooe213
Newbie
Joined: 27 Oct 2003
Posts: 6
|
| Posted: 29 Oct 2003 09:49:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| so is the TI-BASIC for the voyage 200 pretty much the same as say an 83+? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
b__
Member
Joined: 16 Jun 2003
Posts: 173
|
| Posted: 29 Oct 2003 11:27:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Im pretty sure. All basic seems to be basically (no pun intended) the same on all systems. Computers, calculators, etc. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
62 52 53 53
Formerly known as 62 52 53 53
Active Member
Joined: 30 May 2003
Posts: 607
|
| Posted: 30 Oct 2003 09:22:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| assembly isn't programmed in c |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
b__
Member
Joined: 16 Jun 2003
Posts: 173
|
| Posted: 31 Oct 2003 04:22:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I guess that doesnt make sense, what i meant was it can be programmed in c. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
John Barrus
Member
Joined: 25 May 2003
Posts: 131
|
| Posted: 31 Oct 2003 05:17:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| There's basic, 68k asm, and C (TIGCC-compiler) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jeffrey
Member
Joined: 12 Jun 2003
Posts: 212
|
| Posted: 07 Nov 2003 04:46:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Dont confuse 68k with Z80 though, Z-80 is used on the older models. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DarkerLine
ceci n'est pas une |
Super Elite (Last Title)
Joined: 04 Nov 2003
Posts: 8328
|
| Posted: 19 Nov 2003 05:55:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Which is better? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
WhiteDwarf
Newbie
Joined: 10 Nov 2003
Posts: 19
|
| Posted: 20 Nov 2003 02:35:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think Z80 language would be better for Z80 processors and 68k would be better for MC68000 processor  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
sgm
Calc Guru
Joined: 04 Sep 2003
Posts: 1265
|
| Posted: 20 Nov 2003 01:08:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sir Robin wrote: Which is better?
It depends. Z80 is by far the easier language to learn, but once you've learned it, 68000 is infinitely easier to program in.
Last edited by Guest on 20 Nov 2003 01:09:11 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DarkerLine
ceci n'est pas une |
Super Elite (Last Title)
Joined: 04 Nov 2003
Posts: 8328
|
| Posted: 20 Nov 2003 04:56:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Maybe I should try learning Z80. I don't use my 89 that much anyway, and mostly for math (even Basic games are better, faster, and smaller on my 83). |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Arcane Wizard
`semi-hippie`
Super Elite (Last Title)
Joined: 02 Jun 2003
Posts: 8993
|
| Posted: 21 Nov 2003 02:33:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Moved to General Programming. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jeremiah Walgren
General Operations Director
Know-It-All
Joined: 24 May 2003
Posts: 1937
|
| Posted: 28 Nov 2003 12:10:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| There are three types of languages for the Voyage 200. The built in TI-Basic stuff, MC68k assembly stuff, and then the C (TIGCC) stuff. Don't fool yourself by saying that the V200 basic is the same as the 83 Plus. (There are many similarities.) But one thing that isn't the same is that for every If, For, While, etc, you have you must have an EndIf, EndFor, EndWhile to go with it. Makes it a pain porting stuff... And then there's the minor changes in syntax for some of the commands. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DarkerLine
ceci n'est pas une |
Super Elite (Last Title)
Joined: 04 Nov 2003
Posts: 8328
|
| Posted: 28 Nov 2003 03:58:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jeremiah Walgren wrote: And then there's the minor changes in syntax for some of the commands.
mostly the added convention by which built-in functions use parentheses while built-in procedures don't.
Last edited by Guest on 19 Jan 2008 12:49:12 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MaxVT103
Member
Joined: 24 Aug 2003
Posts: 109
|
| Posted: 01 Dec 2003 10:08:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Z80 asm is a pain in the butt to learn. Expecially if it is the first highlevel language you learn. Thats pretty much what I'm doing but it is a fun challenge. Thats why my asm game has taken so long and will take even longer most likely. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Arcane Wizard
`semi-hippie`
Super Elite (Last Title)
Joined: 02 Jun 2003
Posts: 8993
|
| Posted: 01 Dec 2003 12:30:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Since when is assembly high level? Last time I checked assembly was still low level and languages like BASIC, C, JAVA, etc. where high level. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DigiTan
Unregistered HyperCam 2
Super Elite (Last Title)
Joined: 10 Nov 2003
Posts: 4468
|
| Posted: 01 Dec 2003 03:50:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Right. ASM is about as low as it gets. I tell my roommates it's basically 1 step above programming in hex. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jeremiah Walgren
General Operations Director
Know-It-All
Joined: 24 May 2003
Posts: 1937
|
| Posted: 01 Dec 2003 05:17:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Perhaps he meant high-level for him?  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
General Coding and Design => Calculator Programming
