KermMartian wrote:
Meh, I don't really see the appeal. I feel like the whole 3D thing is just going to be a gimmick that's going to fade out fairly quickly.
yeah, just like touch screens and motion control. silly nintendo.
yeah, just like touch screens and motion control. silly nintendo.
JoeYoung wrote:
KermMartian wrote:
Meh, I don't really see the appeal. I feel like the whole 3D thing is just going to be a gimmick that's going to fade out fairly quickly.
yeah, just like touch screens and motion control. silly nintendo.
lol...
when will they learn...
EVERYONE WANTS THE TRANSPARENT SCREENS WE SEE IN MOVIES!!!
who cares about 3D... its completely useless XD
JoeYoung wrote:
KermMartian wrote:
Meh, I don't really see the appeal. I feel like the whole 3D thing is just going to be a gimmick that's going to fade out fairly quickly.
yeah, just like touch screens and motion control. silly nintendo.
Three-dimensional-capable screens, with and without glasses, have been available since at last the 1980s. It's been popular, it faded, it comes back. I don't that it's something that has huge applicability, and that eventually people will go back to interfaces that don't require you to either way awkward glasses or hold your head steady in an exact location. 
KermMartian wrote:
JoeYoung wrote:
KermMartian wrote:
Meh, I don't really see the appeal. I feel like the whole 3D thing is just going to be a gimmick that's going to fade out fairly quickly.
yeah, just like touch screens and motion control. silly nintendo.
Three-dimensional-capable screens, with and without glasses, have been available since at last the 1980s. It's been popular, it faded, it comes back. I don't that it's something that has huge applicability, and that eventually people will go back to interfaces that don't require you to either way awkward glasses or hold your head steady in an exact location.not trying to be a pain here but, I believe that the camera on the front takes 30 pictures per sec. that tries to locate your head.
Thus it will change when your head does.
happybobjr wrote:
KermMartian wrote:
JoeYoung wrote:
KermMartian wrote:
Meh, I don't really see the appeal. I feel like the whole 3D thing is just going to be a gimmick that's going to fade out fairly quickly.
yeah, just like touch screens and motion control. silly nintendo.
Three-dimensional-capable screens, with and without glasses, have been available since at last the 1980s. It's been popular, it faded, it comes back. I don't that it's something that has huge applicability, and that eventually people will go back to interfaces that don't require you to either way awkward glasses or hold your head steady in an exact location.not trying to be a pain here but, I believe that the camera on the front takes 30 pictures per sec. that tries to locate your head.
Thus it will change when your head does.
no, it doesn't work like that.
the image is real 3D, but it only works if you look at it directly and not too far from the side.
up and down should be fine though
the image is real 3D, but it only works if you look at it directly and not too far from the side.
up and down should be fine though
DJ Omnimaga wrote:
happybobjr wrote:
KermMartian wrote:
JoeYoung wrote:
KermMartian wrote:
Meh, I don't really see the appeal. I feel like the whole 3D thing is just going to be a gimmick that's going to fade out fairly quickly.
yeah, just like touch screens and motion control. silly nintendo.
Three-dimensional-capable screens, with and without glasses, have been available since at last the 1980s. It's been popular, it faded, it comes back. I don't that it's something that has huge applicability, and that eventually people will go back to interfaces that don't require you to either way awkward glasses or hold your head steady in an exact location.not trying to be a pain here but, I believe that the camera on the front takes 30 pictures per sec. that tries to locate your head.
Thus it will change when your head does.
wow... that looks really cool...
a dsi... i only have a Ds lite...
i hate it that i can't play those ds wares...
>=(
- 25 Jun 2010 01:07:05 am
- Last edited by KermMartian on 25 Jun 2010 01:21:00 am; edited 1 time in total
JoeYoung wrote:
no, it doesn't work like that.
the image is real 3D, but it only works if you look at it directly and not too far from the side.
up and down should be fine though
Indeed. If you look at the front of the screen in cross section under a microscope, I believe it's this kind of lens:
the image is real 3D, but it only works if you look at it directly and not too far from the side.
up and down should be fine though
Code:
/ \ / \ / \ / \ / \ /\...
A B A B A B A B A B A B A...Where all the As are pixels that end up at your left eye, and all the Bs are pixels that end up at your right eye.
KermMartian wrote:
JoeYoung wrote:
no, it doesn't work like that.
the image is real 3D, but it only works if you look at it directly and not too far from the side.
up and down should be fine though
Indeed. If you look at the front of the screen in cross section under a microscope, I believe it's this kind of lens:
the image is real 3D, but it only works if you look at it directly and not too far from the side.
up and down should be fine though
Code:
/ \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \...
A B A B A B A B A B A B A...Where all the As are pixels that end up at your left eye, and all the Bs are pixels that end up at your right eye.
wow.. clever idea of using the code thing to explain
Register to Join the Conversation
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Advertisement