KermMartian wrote:
Would work fine as far as I can see. It's like Simms' mentally challenged great-grandfather. 
Except I'm guessing it works a whole lot better than Simms' echo-back-what-you-said-and/or-repeat-the-same-thing functionality
Except I'm guessing it works a whole lot better than Simms' echo-back-what-you-said-and/or-repeat-the-same-thing functionality
Ok so rthprog are in an epic battle of connect 4 AI's, I'll be taking bets on who's AI will win now haha if anybody else has one, post it up
haha if anybody else has one, post it up 
TheStorm wrote:
It sounds Like a cool idea almost like a Simms ai in ti basic, except better :p
Except it doesn't have any grasp of grammar, what the hell your actually saying, and it only uses a simple idea to give you associated ideas/objects/whatevers
Kllrnohj wrote:
KermMartian wrote:
Would work fine as far as I can see. It's like Simms' mentally challenged great-grandfather.
Except I'm guessing it works a whole lot better than Simms' echo-back-what-you-said-and/or-repeat-the-same-thing functionality
Its an autistic savant!
Any fool can use a computer. Many do.
Harq wrote:
TheStorm wrote:
It sounds Like a cool idea almost like a Simms ai in ti basic, except better :p
Except it doesn't have any grasp of grammar, what the hell your actually saying, and it only uses a simple idea to give you associated ideas/objects/whatevers
Kllrnohj wrote:
KermMartian wrote:
Would work fine as far as I can see. It's like Simms' mentally challenged great-grandfather.
Except I'm guessing it works a whole lot better than Simms' echo-back-what-you-said-and/or-repeat-the-same-thing functionality
Its an autistic savant!
I got the association idea from pandorabots... I would highly suggest looking at it.
And yes Grant, I'm re-coding my connect 4... my current method (which I've already explained to you) gets stuck in "loops" quite easily because it often dosent find any purpose to "cut", and so it keeps dynamically planning essentially the whole game...
rthprog wrote:
Harq wrote:
TheStorm wrote:
It sounds Like a cool idea almost like a Simms ai in ti basic, except better :p
Except it doesn't have any grasp of grammar, what the hell your actually saying, and it only uses a simple idea to give you associated ideas/objects/whatevers
Kllrnohj wrote:
KermMartian wrote:
Would work fine as far as I can see. It's like Simms' mentally challenged great-grandfather.
Except I'm guessing it works a whole lot better than Simms' echo-back-what-you-said-and/or-repeat-the-same-thing functionality
Its an autistic savant!
I got the association idea from pandorabots... I would highly suggest looking at it.
And yes Grant, I'm re-coding my connect 4... my current method (which I've already explained to you) gets stuck in "loops" quite easily because it often dosent find any purpose to "cut", and so it keeps dynamically planning essentially the whole game...
Whoa its been a while but I kinda finished a rather good version of this (if I say so myself) that simply reads sentences, identifies "key words" and associates them under a tagging system. Then looking up any of these words brings up a list of related words! (it works by removing "common words" that are saved in a master list which can be edited by the user)
Thus by entering "As of today I can kick a soccer ball better than ever before" you would get a group of words "kick", "soccer"and "ball" that get tagged together so looking up the word "soccer" would result in "kick" and "ball". Of course it also gives the user the ability to remove words as it does make some mistakes...
That's fairly similar to the contextual method Simms employs, although due to the way I'm organizing its brain, it requires far more computations per output than is reasonable to give a coherent response.
KermMartian wrote:
That's fairly similar to the contextual method Simms employs, although due to the way I'm organizing its brain, it requires far more computations per output than is reasonable to give a coherent response.
How were you planning to generate a coherent response? Because in theory all a program can do is add to a statement or answer a question from a database....
hmm I'm wondering if its possible for it to pose a question to expand its knowledge base.....
Register to Join the Conversation
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Advertisement