I'm happy to note that I also purchased a one year "no questions asked" warranty for it. Apparently, I can return it or have it repaired and they will pay for it "no questions asked." Hopefully this will cover any n00b mistakes I may make
Chipmaster wrote:
I'm happy to note that I also purchased a one year "no questions asked" warranty for it. Apparently, I can return it or have it repaired and they will pay for it "no questions asked." Hopefully this will cover any n00b mistakes I may make
"Yeah, I decided to solder wires to random points around the board. Can I have a new one please?"
Chipmaster wrote:
I'm happy to note that I also purchased a one year "no questions asked" warranty for it. Apparently, I can return it or have it repaired and they will pay for it "no questions asked." Hopefully this will cover any n00b mistakes I may make
it won't cover n00b mistakes me thinks
and doing ANY modifications (be it overclocking, or "soldering random wires on") voids ALL warantee's, and if you RMA it after doing that you are considered an a-hole and should be shot
What's wrong with overclocking?!
When you screw up and blame others for your own faults
KermMartian wrote:
What's wrong with overclocking?!
nothing, i have my CPU, northbridge, and GPU overclocked right now...
Kllrnohj wrote:
KermMartian wrote:
What's wrong with overclocking?!
nothing, I have my CPU, northbridge, and GPU overclocked right now...
Do you really get that much of a benefit from OCing your GPU?
Sometimes there's a noticeable benefit; other times it's just to show off; like when I oc'd my calc to 15 MHz
I've done that. You can only get it to about 20MHz before instability kicks in :/
fun, what can Silver be taken to before it gets unstable?
Not a whole lot more; it's already overclocked by TI.
ok, didn't relize that. I thought that they were diffrent chips.
Nope, same z80 chip, just at different core speeds.
what I meant by diffrent chips is like the diffrent between an Atolon XP @ 1.2 ghz and one at 1.4
rivereye wrote:
what I meant by diffrent chips is like the diffrent between an Atolon XP @ 1.2 ghz and one at 1.4
those are the same chip too
thats the reason "slower" chips overclock "more" - often they are the exact same as their faster siblings, only badged/clocked slower because there is a demand for the slower, cheaper chips. SOMETIMES they are "crippled" chips that were unstable at the required speed for the highend, but are more than adequate for the lowend (thats what celerons are, pentiums with partially bad caches )
@Kerm:
OC'ing a GPU can get anywhere from 3-10 FPS increase - not a whole lot, but it can help level out the drops in framerates during heavy/busy frames, such as large firefights in an FPS
Kllrnohj wrote:
rivereye wrote:
what I meant by diffrent chips is like the diffrent between an Atolon XP @ 1.2 ghz and one at 1.4
those are the same chip too
thats the reason "slower" chips overclock "more" - often they are the exact same as their faster siblings, only badged/clocked slower because there is a demand for the slower, cheaper chips. SOMETIMES they are "crippled" chips that were unstable at the required speed for the highend, but are more than adequate for the lowend (thats what celerons are, pentiums with partially bad caches )
They can also be the same chip with the same specs but less or omitted L2 cache, as in the case of one of the Athlon series.
quick question,
I got my hands on a second monitor, so I dug out my old nVidia TNT2 AGP video card to use the monitor. The other card is an nVidia GeForce MX 4000 PCI (not PCI-E). I set the BIOS and Windows to mage the MX 4000 the primary monitor/card. I found drivers for the TNT2, installed and restarted, but now Blockland will not play. The drivers had OpenGL 1.5. I had the MX 4000 drivers installed before I did this. Can I get some help?
I tried to help him with this, and we got the menus to show up, but no 3dized content. Ideas?
KermMartian wrote:
They can also be the same chip with the same specs but less or omitted L2 cache, as in the case of one of the Athlon series.
it is still made using the same process, and has the "missing" cache on the chip. But as i mentioned, part of the cache might be malfunctioning, hence turned off at the fab and turned into something like the Celeron.
Register to Join the Conversation
Have your own thoughts to add to this or any other topic? Want to ask a question, offer a suggestion, share your own programs and projects, upload a file to the file archives, get help with calculator and computer programming, or simply chat with like-minded coders and tech and calculator enthusiasts via the site-wide AJAX SAX widget? Registration for a free Cemetech account only takes a minute.
»
Go to Registration page
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum