The movie starts out on a train - pretty much just the interior - then about five minutes in we cut to the train station and don't see a train for the rest of the film. If we get the time we'll definitely take exterior shots and but unlikely any side of the rail shots of the train passing. For your obsession, I'll post details about the train when we film on it!
Sadly, as for watching it you're SOL.
I understand that we can't distribute the movie. Not on YouTube, not on my website, not on Facebook or via USB/DVD/BRay/etc. The only way you could watch it is if we submit it to a film festival in your area. We can however, release a trailer which can be put on YouTube and wherever we desire.
It's a rights issue. The next movie he makes will not be a Steven King adaption. That's not because of the limitations we're working under, but he figured it would be a great, and fast way to make a first movie. The next film would be copyrighted soley to him (and whoever else) so that he could sell copies, upload it to YouTube and such.
You'll have to plan a trip back out to the SF Bay Area around March next year
That's when
Cinequest is held and our first festival for the film.
swivelgames wrote:
Why only 24fps? I'm surprised that with such a sophisticate camera you all won't be taking advantage of it. Why not just use a Handycam or something?
Contrary to modern day popular belief, movies are shot at 24 frames per second on film, opposed 30 frames per second on digital. A lot of movies are shot on film and thus at 24fps, and he's going for the cinematic feel. He's a major movie buff so I suppose he notices that stuff more than the rest of us. He's mentioned that there may be scenes he wants to shoot in slow-motion but I think it's more of a "if we get a chance, let's film it twice."
We won't be using a handycam because we pretty much need a RAW video format. The MX sensor has 13.5 stops of light sensitivity in RAW, opposed to 10 stops in 35mm film and basically none in a non RAW format. Since we're shooting at night with little to no stage lights, we may not be able to shoot the scene as bright as we desire. So, those extra stops will help us in post, as well as ensure we don't have any blownout highlights or shadows.
We also won't be strictly shooting with the RED. I proposed we use a DSLR as an "alternate viewpoint" camera that some crew member can hold. Get behind the scene shots as well as a second angle of the scene. A lot of the camera movements will be precise and the placement will be pretty static for each scene. So, we won't really know what the scene would look like from a different angle while we're shooting it.
When we location scout, we'll get a general idea of where the camera will go for each scene, and we can think "Oh, what about over here as well?" but we won't know how good the second angle would be unless we shoot it. So, that's where the DSLR would come in handy. Maybe we'll use the DSLR footage or maybe we'll reposition the camera and shoot the scene again.