KermMartian wrote:
happybobjr wrote:
oh, i have been waiting so much for these.
On a side note: i Love mirage. I now love Doors. Doors hates Mirage. Epic battle on my calculator is taking place.
MirageOS hates Doors CS too. 
May I ask what MirageOS offers you that Doors CS does not that's keeping it on your calculator? 
I work very fast with mirage. Doors has more compatibility though.
Mirage's Gui just feels better to me too (as i have used it for so long)
If only Doors and Mirage got along together so i could use both...
Do you understand? I can't throw away an old friend... It's just like those shoes you still wear after they aren't good anymore because they have memories...
On a side note: take all the time you need to grade these entries. We can wait.
*happybobjr barely contains the urge to hack Cemetech to get to play the entries a few days earlier... > >
On another side note: My spelling and grammar is atrocious today.
You can work equally fast with Doors CS if you memorize the keyboard shortcuts, in my opinion, but to each his own. And I understand that it's hard to change habits; no one likes change.
Thanks to the amazing tifreak8x, I now have a nice useable rubric for grading entries, and as soon as Rivereye shows up, I'll send him all the entries and the rubric. HappyBobJr, thanks for being understanding about my time.
Results by Tuesday? YES! I demanded they be done by Wednesday and my demands have been met! Most excellent
Anywho, good luck to everyone, especially me! I hope Raylin wins!
KeithJohansen wrote:
Results by Tuesday? YES! I demanded they be done by Wednesday and my demands have been met! Most excellent
Anywho, good luck to everyone, especially me!
I hope Raylin wins!
Kindness! This is MADNESS! Good luck to you too sir.
Raylin wrote:
KeithJohansen wrote:
Results by Tuesday? YES! I demanded they be done by Wednesday and my demands have been met! Most excellent
Anywho, good luck to everyone, especially me!
I hope Raylin wins!
Kindness! This is MADNESS! Good luck to you too sir.
Slight problem: Rivereye can't do anything until Thursday; he's slammed with work. The options are to have a single Kerm do the grading with no other judge to average in, or wait until Thursday or Friday for the results.
Hmm... Tough choice, I call vote!
Thursday or Friday is fine. I said you could take until then. Still meeting my demands `-`
Also, this:
Quote:
Raylin! Raylin! Gonna win! Coded his entry in 30 min!
Raylin! Raylin! He's our guy! His BASIC skills are super fly!
GOOOO RAYLIN!
A cheerleader chant? Super-duper-awesome! Raylin 100% gets my respect for a daring feat.
xXEpicxXXxFailXx wrote:
A cheerleader chant? Super-duper-awesome! Raylin 100% gets my respect for a daring feat.
For real, and nice cheerleader chant!
EpicFail, what's your vote?
KermMartian wrote:
EpicFail, what's your vote?
To get the most accurate results, I vote on waiting for RiverEye. That way there isn't a lot of pressure on you, and the results will be more refined, so to speak.
I agree, I think that again, that's the most fair since that's what was announced. It seems there's some unrest among the ranks about the grading though, so I want to make sure I won't have an uprising on my hands.
I also agree, for what it's worth.
Raylin wrote:
I also agree, for what it's worth.
Aight, I'm glad to hear that almost half the contest participants can live with waiting a few extra days. I'll definitely try to get started on my half in the mean time, as soon as I can publish a three-calc NetPong video. I'm trying to smooth out the last few bugs.
*bump* For your edification, the rubric that we're using:
Code: Grounds for Immediate Rejection of Entry:
----------------------------------------------------------------
1. Entry not submitted by deadline.
2. Entry was released before deadline.
3. Source code not provided (applicable for ASM only)
4. Program does not work (occasional bugs or glitches are okay but may reduce score)
5. Program does not use any DCS features
Grading Criteria (0 to 10 points per numbered category)
----------------------------------------------------------------
1. Originality - SCORE _____/10
---- Has it been done before? Is this a lot better, if so?
---- If it's original, is that good? Is that awesome?
2. Use of Doors CS 7 - SCORE _____/30
---- Does it use the BASIC or ASM header?
---- Does it use XLib/Celtic/etc Lib functions?
---- Most importantly, does it use DCSB Lib or ASM DCS libs?
---- Any other cool interactions with DCS?
3. Function-ability - SCORE _____/10
---- How well the entry functions
---- Ease of installation
---- Ease of use/game play/ keys
---- Speed of program (this is relative to the program genre)
4. Graphics (ascii or bitmap) - SCORE _____/10
---- Originality
---- Use of graphics
5. Readme file - SCORE _____/10
---- Describes program
---- Author info, including contact information
---- How to upload the game to the calculator
---- Requirements such as shells and libraries explicitly stated
---- Game play instructions
---- Credit authors of routines/programs
6. Source Code - SCORE _____/10
---- Quantity of Comments
---- Quality of Comments
---- Consistent coding style
---- Efficiency
7. Bonus Points - SCORE _____/10
---- Link play
---- Runs on more than one calc family
---- Grayscale
---- Sound
TOTAL SCORE _____ (maximum of 80 points before bonus)
You can let me be the only Judge
* happybob thinks to himself, "yes i shall when even though i didn't enter!"
I am fine with waiting. (Although my calculator isn't)
I wish the results would be announced by Tuesday, but I am fine with waiting as long as the results would be announced by Thursday
KermMartian wrote:
*bump* For your edification, the rubric that we're using:
Grounds for Immediate Rejection of Entry:
----------------------------------------------------------------
1. Entry not submitted by deadline.
2. Entry was released before deadline.
3. Source code not provided (applicable for ASM only)
4. Program does not work (occasional bugs or glitches are okay but may reduce score)
5. Program does not use any DCS features
Grading Criteria (0 to 10 points per numbered category)
----------------------------------------------------------------
1. Originality - SCORE _____/10
---- Has it been done before? Is this a lot better, if so?
---- If it's original, is that good? Is that awesome?
2. Use of Doors CS 7 - SCORE _____/30
---- Does it use the BASIC or ASM header?
---- Does it use XLib/Celtic/etc Lib functions?
---- Most importantly, does it use DCSB Lib or ASM DCS libs?
---- Any other cool interactions with DCS?
3. Function-ability - SCORE _____/10
---- How well the entry functions
---- Ease of installation
---- Ease of use/game play/ keys
---- Speed of program (this is relative to the program genre)
4. Graphics (ascii or bitmap) - SCORE _____/10
---- Originality
---- Use of graphics
5. Readme file - SCORE _____/10
---- Describes program
---- Author info, including contact information
---- How to upload the game to the calculator
---- Requirements such as shells and libraries explicitly stated
---- Game play instructions
---- Credit authors of routines/programs
6. Source Code - SCORE _____/10
---- Quantity of Comments
---- Quality of Comments
---- Consistent coding style
---- Efficiency
7. Bonus Points - SCORE _____/10
---- Link play
---- Runs on more than one calc family
---- Grayscale
---- Sound
TOTAL SCORE _____ (maximum of 80 points before bonus)
FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF-
Wow'
I can't believe it, it"s finally over
ITs been fun working my butt off on ti-mail
I camt wait for the results
(Ti-Mail get bonus for linking
)
@qazz: Hehe, as long as it tests working.
@Raylin: Well, it is a *DCS* contest.
@Svouik: I'd announce preliminaries from my own grading, but I think that would be unfair since it might give some people undue hope, and others undue depression.
Nice rubric, I like the bonus section (so glad mine can run on any of the TI-83+ family). Reviewing my game myself, I can see I would get a considerable score, but still could be better.
Register to Join the Conversation
Have your own thoughts to add to this or any other topic? Want to ask a question, offer a suggestion, share your own programs and projects, upload a file to the file archives, get help with calculator and computer programming, or simply chat with like-minded coders and tech and calculator enthusiasts via the site-wide AJAX SAX widget? Registration for a free Cemetech account only takes a minute.
»
Go to Registration page
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
