yeah, IE7 will be better (but the one thing I don't like about IE7 is that it looks like FF with a different skin and no extendibility.
I am the eye of the river
>(<')
>(<')
Ultimate Dev'r wrote:
Oh the irony... 
I use Firefox/or netscape due to which GUI I am entering(CDE or Java) on Solaris, just not on windows. 
rivereye wrote:
yeah, IE7 will be better (but the one thing I don't like about IE7 is that it looks like FF with a different skin and no extendibility.
I think IE7 looks like they just threw a whole bunch of IE6's into a tab control (which conveniently explains the messed up toolbar arrangement AND that it renders pages equally as crappy as IE6...
)
@Netham: I have no idea what you are talking about concerning IE6's "advantages". It is slow to render webpages, it doesn't render them correctly, is riddled with EXPLOITED holes, has no tab browsing, no extensions, and no customization. The only reason it appears to start so quickly is because ITS ALREADY LOADED. Netscape is almost worse than IE6. Stick with Firefox or Opera instead
I personally hate tabs. They get me confused. Netscape DOES suck. I hate Firefox too. I havn't tried Opera.
netham45 wrote:
I personally hate tabs. They get me confused. Netscape DOES suck. I hate Firefox too. I havn't tried Opera.
...are you serious? You'd rather have 5 IE windows cluttering your taskbar than 5 tabs? wow.... my opinion of you continues to accelerate at -9.8m/s
Quote:
...are you serious? You'd rather have 5 IE windows cluttering your taskbar than 5 tabs? wow.... my opinion of you continues to accelerate at -9.8m/s
You mean it's not at zero yet?
Well... I can just click on the Internet Explorer(X) button in my start bar and see the titles of all of the windows instead of seeing "Cemetech..." in a tabs window. I like to be able to tell which window is which without having to guess. Oh, and my opinion of you just reached it's negative bandwidth limit of -2TB
netham45 wrote:
Oh, and my opinion of you just reached it's negative bandwidth limit of -2TB
Praytell, how do you have negative bandwidth?
netham45 wrote:
It was a metaphor.
No, it was just stupid -> http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=metaphor&x=0&y=0 <-
Quote:
Praytell, how do you have negative bandwidth?
Basically netham is giving you bandwidth
Quote:
Well... I can just click on the Internet Explorer(X) button in my start bar and see the titles of all of the windows instead of seeing "Cemetech..." in a tabs window.
Looking at the title bar has the same effect
netham45 wrote:
Not if I have 10 windows full screened.
It doesn't matter if its full screened or not, it still takes up the same amount of space in the taskbar - of which there is LESS taskbar space than the space available for tabs
Look at these two images, the firefox tabs (of which there are more of than open IE windows) have a longer title message than the IE windows (which also block my view of other open programs)
One of the cool features of FF is that you can download extensions where you can configure the appearance of tabs. You can set it up in such a way where you can see the full names of each if you want.
Netham, in regards to your screen shot, I hate the XP gouping thing, it annoys the hell out of me when it does that, then I have to scroll through that to see my program, I would rather have a squisshed taskbar.
I am the eye of the river
>(<')
>(<')
Register to Join the Conversation
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Advertisement