Well, that's fascinating. I hope it works out well. 
I bet a few people are considering useing this code if Platformer wins (atleast part of it) *cough* CalcMan06 *cough*
*cough*
16:24:43 CalcMan06: tifreak8x is probably disqualifying me right now for grabbing Kerm's code.... lol
*cough*[/quote]
*cough*
Sax wrote:
16:24:43 CalcMan06: tifreak8x is probably disqualifying me right now for grabbing Kerm's code.... lol
*cough*[/quote]
Any fool can use a computer. Many do.
KermMartian wrote:
Actually, it looks like he wants it for Dan's contest. 
And yes, ZNLVL just renders the lines.
And yes, ZNLVL just renders the lines.
No, if Platformer wins, I'm using it for Cemetech's.... if that's ok, of course.....
(MUST GET THAT SOFTY KREEM!)
*sob* I feel so lost with Platformer winning. Like... Like life has no purpose... *soooob!* 
P.S. Almost lost enough to make 20 accounts and have them all vote Strategy
P.S. Almost lost enough to make 20 accounts and have them all vote Strategy
Any fool can use a computer. Many do.
CalcMan06 wrote:
KermMartian wrote:
Actually, it looks like he wants it for Dan's contest.
And yes, ZNLVL just renders the lines.
And yes, ZNLVL just renders the lines.
No, if Platformer wins, I'm using it for Cemetech's.... if that's ok, of course.....
Excellent, glad to hear it. That's fine.
It seems as though Platformer has NOT won, so I'm not going to use this. Oh well, it would have been harder to program a platformer, especially one made by someone else. 
Especially when you don't understand some of the *cough*variables*cough*
Especially when you don't understand some of the *cough*variables*cough*
(MUST GET THAT SOFTY KREEM!)
Yup, my code tends to be really confusingly optimized to people other than me. I actually might end up working on this more in BASIC before I attempt it in ASM. We'll see.
I understand what most of the variables are, and I THINK I have a vague idea as to what C and D are....
(MUST GET THAT SOFTY KREEM!)
(a,b) = current (x,y)
(e,f) = previous (x,y)
(c,d) = velocity in (x,y)
It is of course taken as having constant acceleration in x,y (0,-9.
(e,f) = previous (x,y)
(c,d) = velocity in (x,y)
It is of course taken as having constant acceleration in x,y (0,-9.
That's what I thought C and D were.... well, now that I understand what the variables are, I should have a slightly easier time figuring out what happens at various points in the program. I really need to work on my contest entry....
(MUST GET THAT SOFTY KREEM!)
That's the thing about TI-BASIC. Meaningful variable names are important to others helping you with code. I find that on calc projects, if I give up for a couple weeks, I can't even understand my own code to finish it.
Well, it doesn't help that TI-BASIC only has one-letter variable names, either.
(MUST GET THAT SOFTY KREEM!)
CalcMan06 wrote:
Well, it doesn't help that TI-BASIC only has one-letter variable names, either.
That's what I was talking about...
foamy3 wrote:
That's the thing about TI-BASIC. Meaningful variable names are important to others helping you with code. I find that on calc projects, if I give up for a couple weeks, I can't even understand my own code to finish it.
It helps having a project page and writing down what the variables are use for.
@Calcman06: I think platformers are actually easier than Strategy. You have to think of more complex rules to implement with strategy than with platformer.
Register to Join the Conversation
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Advertisement