A simple poll.

I was unimpressed by the cg100 Python language because of the editor and its limitations. Most CG50 scripts will run, but you won't be able to see the code because it's too big. While the removal of Casio Basic is not a huge loss compared to if TI removed TI-BASIC from the TI-84 Plus CE (due to limitations such as the lack of ASM libs and running programs from flash memory instead of just RAM), there are still a lot of people who are disappointed that it was removed.

Well.My only program,CG Math Box(Not on cemetech but i will upload)is written by Casio basic!

The ClassWiz-style keypad was already infamous for being clunky and unintuitive thanks to the fx-991CW, and the new specifications of the fx-CG100 compared to its predecessor are overall worse. This has already created a surge in demand for the fx-991EX, the 991CW's predecessor, so I anticipate the same happening here.

The demand is so great that there are even fake fx-991EX calculators in circulation now! Very cheaply made copies that don't use solar power, can't perform arithmetic without errors and sometimes just die outright for no reason.

ClasswizII is real a and almost not usable,ClassWizI is real god.

Can you clarify what your particular complaints about the CG100 and the Classwiz II are, Yggdrasil? HydrideGS mentioned the keyboard on the latter, and the programming limitations on the CG100 that DJ Omnimaga mentioned are certainly a pain; anything that particularly bothers you?

I am a old user,I’m quite used to keyboard of ES/ClassWiz I series,and not ClassWiz II.
And my all program project is on CasioBasic or PrizmSDK and both can’t transplanted to CG100.
Then CG100 make FlashRom from 16MB to Australian 4.5MB,so Casio is very lazy because they don’t like to make a International and Australian model.4.5MB is hard to install my add-ins.
Picture Plot doesn’t matter.

I own a fx-CG50 and the new fx-CG100 B&W UI was a good move there round old outdated button design and not very good move, they should of stuck with the rectangle buttons as they are nicer to use and more room for text to be printed on the buttons rather obscure location around the button.

I don’t know what the screen quality is like but seriously same spec as fx-CG50 I suspect it also has a washed out colorless display were color look washed out and dreadful viewing angles.

My HP Prime on the other hand has a resolution of 320x240 32bit color and color is quite decent allowing for alpha channel and good quality keyboard and good amount of storage with a powerful Pascal style language PPL along with micro python

The HP Prime can run apps written in Python and PPL quite fast just as good as C apps for fx-CG50