Fair enough. Post when you do.
KermMartian wrote:
orly? I would...although I guess not compared with the modelling of the vehicles I do into AutoDesk VIZ. 
Doom3 is graphically intensive, F.E.A.R, HL2, etc.. are all intensive
blockland is weak. low poly models, low res textures, no graphical strain at all....(it IS fun mind you) - although the engine appears to have trouble with large numbers of blocks....
- 02 Mar 2006 05:30:34 pm
- Last edited by elfprince13 on 02 Mar 2006 05:34:14 pm; edited 1 time in total
allright...I though I had it let me see....
EDIT: nvm....downloading now
EDIT: nvm....downloading now
KermMartian wrote:
Jonathan_Pezzino wrote:
Kllrnohj wrote:
blockland's not exactly what I'd call "graphically intensive", lol
Indeed, I find it amusing that Kerm is concerned about finding a tablet that will run BL. Blockland is probably the least graphically intensive 3D game possible (well, not quite, but almost). I think Kerm gets confused between graphically intensive and computationally intensive because he's always hosting -- not only does his comp have to handle the strain of being the server, but his maps are GIGANTIC. That means he's getting slowdown from massive amounts of data transfer, not graphical intensity.True, true. I've found that ~700MHz, ~128MB ram machines can't play it at all though.
Jonathan_Pezzino wrote:
KermMartian wrote:
Jonathan_Pezzino wrote:
Kllrnohj wrote:
blockland's not exactly what I'd call "graphically intensive", lol
Indeed, I find it amusing that Kerm is concerned about finding a tablet that will run BL. Blockland is probably the least graphically intensive 3D game possible (well, not quite, but almost). I think Kerm gets confused between graphically intensive and computationally intensive because he's always hosting -- not only does his comp have to handle the strain of being the server, but his maps are GIGANTIC. That means he's getting slowdown from massive amounts of data transfer, not graphical intensity.True, true. I've found that ~700MHz, ~128MB ram machines can't play it at all though.
No, in the classroom where I had calc last semester. :/
Jonathan_Pezzino wrote:
Wow...where do you find a machine like that? Your basement?
our school has lots of them
EDIT:
===
it seems that my driver is actually newer than the one on the intel site....
EDIT2:
===
Quote:
Video Init:
Accelerated OpenGL display device not detected.
Accelerated D3D device not detected.
Voodoo 2 display device not detected.
"OpenGL" display device not found!
"OpenGL" display device not found!
"D3D" display device not found!
"Voodoo2" display device not found!
Loading compiled script common/ui/defaultProfiles.cs.
elfprince13 wrote:
Jonathan_Pezzino wrote:
Wow...where do you find a machine like that? Your basement?
our school has lots of them
EDIT:
===
it seems that my driver is actually newer than the one on the intel site....
EDIT2:
===
Quote:
Video Init:
Accelerated OpenGL display device not detected.
Accelerated D3D device not detected.
Voodoo 2 display device not detected.
"OpenGL" display device not found!
"OpenGL" display device not found!
"D3D" display device not found!
"Voodoo2" display device not found!
Loading compiled script common/ui/defaultProfiles.cs.
- 02 Mar 2006 08:42:59 pm
- Last edited by elfprince13 on 02 Mar 2006 08:49:20 pm; edited 1 time in total
also, I have DirectX 9.0 installed.
elfprince13 wrote:
btw....that is a Windows comp....I just skinned it.
Yeah, I figured that.
Hmm, I'm stumped, usually the driver update does the trick...
i'd go ahead and do the "downgrade" - maybe intel did that for a reason (or maybe you have faulty drivers - intel's site only lists up to ver 6.7 rel 3196)
however, i'd like to point out intel intergrated graphics aren't really 3d accelerators (not at heart anyway, i think its possible for em to do 3d, but its so crappy it ain't worth it), so it might not be a driver issue at all, but rather a the-chip-sucks-ballz issue instead...
however, i'd like to point out intel intergrated graphics aren't really 3d accelerators (not at heart anyway, i think its possible for em to do 3d, but its so crappy it ain't worth it), so it might not be a driver issue at all, but rather a the-chip-sucks-ballz issue instead...
Kllrnohj wrote:
I'd go ahead and do the "downgrade" - maybe intel did that for a reason (or maybe you have faulty drivers - intel's site only lists up to ver 6.7 rel 3196)
however, I'd like to point out intel intergrated graphics aren't really 3d accelerators (not at heart anyway, I think its possible for em to do 3d, but its so crappy it ain't worth it), so it might not be a driver issue at all, but rather a the-chip-sucks-ballz issue instead...
however, I'd like to point out intel intergrated graphics aren't really 3d accelerators (not at heart anyway, I think its possible for em to do 3d, but its so crappy it ain't worth it), so it might not be a driver issue at all, but rather a the-chip-sucks-ballz issue instead...
That's what I was thinking, and that's why I didn't want Intel integrated graphics for my tablet. Yay for NVidia GeForce Go.
Register to Join the Conversation
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Advertisement