Not having much else to do today, I measured the current draw of most of my calculators. I used a standard multimeter between the calculator and a 5V power supply (actually producing 5.1V), measuring current. After collecting and tabulating the data, I converted everything to microamps and shoved it through some basic math to give a measure of the average current draw (90% off, 9.5% idle, 0.5% busy).

Data!



The earliest TI-81s, as expected, used the most power when idle. However, when they were off, the multimeter's most sensitive setting couldn't accurately detect any current draw (which bottoms out at 0.1 μA). Of the z80 calculators I tested, the early TI-82 used the most power when off, and the early TI-81s the least. The TI-89 Titanium used the most power when off, even surpassing the CBL2. Calculators based off of the TI-82 (TI-81 ROM V2.0x, TI-82, TI-83 series) had significantly elevated power consumption when off compared to TI-81 derivatives, but generally used less power when operating. The TI-84 Plus tested uses 3.3V logic, which is significantly more efficient when operating; current draw when off is still high, but the TI-84 Plus runs more things in the background (like a clock).

The TI-82 and later TI-81s use a Toshiba TC14L010AF ASIC and a discrete Z80 IC (either a Zilog Z84C00 or a Toshiba T84C00). The TI-83 uses a similar construction, but integrates the Z80 into the ASIC. The TI-81 derivatives do the same, integrating a Z80 core into their T6A49/A (early TI-81) or T6A43 (later ROM 1.x TI-81, TI-85) ASICs. The TI-81 ROM 1.x and TI-85 use two column drivers and one row driver, whereas the TI-82 and its derivatives combine the row and column drivers into one small IC. The TI-86 uses one row driver and one column driver.
This is rad stuff!
You didn't mention the TI-83+ in the text but from the tables I see: My calc is the best! Very Happy Razz
Nik wrote:
You didn't mention the TI-83+ in the text but from the tables I see: My calc is the best! Very Happy Razz


Nah, that TI-81 12xxxxx-serial is the best. I left the batteries in it for four months and they were at the same battery level I left it at. Very Happy

EDIT: inb4 civil war
Don't neglect that 60uA power draw.

According to my own measurements, the numbers above are still accurate for a HW4 TI-89 Titanium calc bought new halfway through 2024. (My code is 4571007370M-1222R)
  
Register to Join the Conversation
Have your own thoughts to add to this or any other topic? Want to ask a question, offer a suggestion, share your own programs and projects, upload a file to the file archives, get help with calculator and computer programming, or simply chat with like-minded coders and tech and calculator enthusiasts via the site-wide AJAX SAX widget? Registration for a free Cemetech account only takes a minute.

» Go to Registration page
Page 1 of 1
» All times are UTC - 5 Hours
 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 

Advertisement