Ah, very nice. I'm looking forward to getting a few spare minutes to play with that picture you sent me; it's sitting happily in my pix2sort folder waiting for its time in the limelight.
KermMartian wrote:
Ah, very nice. I'm looking forward to getting a few spare minutes to play with that picture you sent me; it's sitting happily in my pix2sort folder waiting for its time in the limelight.
Hehe. If you'd rather have the second photo I took straight up, I'll happily send you the RAW file to work with. I also think it'd produce a better result across multiple monitors 
There are two types of people in the world: those who can extrapolate data from incomplete data
Oo, just 3,400 pixels short :D
There are two types of people in the world: those who can extrapolate data from incomplete data
comicIDIOT wrote:
Oo, just 3,400 pixels short 
Aww, sorry to hear it. 
Let me know when you shoot an image that large, and I'll see what I can do as far as making it a quadmonitor wallpaper.
Updated a photo.
Before & After:
Rid the hot spot found in the centre.
Before & After:
Rid the hot spot found in the centre.
There are two types of people in the world: those who can extrapolate data from incomplete data
Aye, indeed you did! I was happy that I was able to spot that unassisted before I read your change. 
I agree that that looks nicer.
I agree that that looks nicer. 
WhiteValkery wrote:
hmm... i still can't tell whats different even with the help
If you look at her t-shirt right under her hands, in the top image it's just solid white, whereas in the bottom image it's a bit darker, and you can see some of the drapes and folds of the fabric. KermMartian wrote:
WhiteValkery wrote:
hmm... i still can't tell whats different even with the help
If you look at her t-shirt right under her hands, in the top image it's just solid white, whereas in the bottom image it's a bit darker, and you can see some of the drapes and folds of the fabric.oh!!
yes! now i can see it!
that's cool
As well as inside the tattoo a bit.
Also, new watermark idea:
I'm liking the watermark on the side a bit more. The banner uses the colours found on my website.
Also, new watermark idea:
I'm liking the watermark on the side a bit more. The banner uses the colours found on my website.
There are two types of people in the world: those who can extrapolate data from incomplete data
It looks to me like you're trying to say that that's Alex Glanville. You should move it side and down a bit imho.
You should move it side and down a bit imho.
I see what you mean. I've also decided it's too wide/tall. I came up with an interesting idea for a watermark and am working on it now. It'll be a tedious task to finish!
There are two types of people in the world: those who can extrapolate data from incomplete data
comicIDIOT wrote:
I see what you mean. I've also decided it's too wide/tall. I came up with an interesting idea for a watermark and am working on it now. It'll be a tedious task to finish!
Good luck, I look forward to the result. In the meantime, I'll have to take you away from your work for the sake of UT. KermMartian wrote:
comicIDIOT wrote:
I see what you mean. I've also decided it's too wide/tall. I came up with an interesting idea for a watermark and am working on it now. It'll be a tedious task to finish!
Good luck, I look forward to the result. In the meantime, I'll have to take you away from your work for the sake of UT.
There are two types of people in the world: those who can extrapolate data from incomplete data
comicIDIOT wrote:
KermMartian wrote:
comicIDIOT wrote:
I see what you mean. I've also decided it's too wide/tall. I came up with an interesting idea for a watermark and am working on it now. It'll be a tedious task to finish!
Good luck, I look forward to the result. In the meantime, I'll have to take you away from your work for the sake of UT. KermMartian wrote:
Back to our regularly-scheduled photography talk.
I have a few ideas.
It started out as morse code for a copyright. I could contain it to a single row a pixels and it'd be out of the way and possibly overlooked. And those who don't know morse code would be out of luck as to finding out who took the photo.
Then I decided I'd use a barcode! Since, it's a product and there are barcode fonts out there. But, I decided it wouldn't be very ideal. Then came another idea. QR-Code. I can give it a website to be encrypted and when the user scans the QR it'll go to my website.
Or, this one that gives more copyright info and a text link.
I made a large one so it can be scaled easily from my larger exports to my smaller ones to keep a consistant size. Now, to see how it looks on a photo
Update: Found a second copy of the QR code image on Facebook, linked to it.
There are two types of people in the world: those who can extrapolate data from incomplete data
Very nice. What about putting comicIDIOT Photography on two lines next to the QR code in some pixel font?
Register to Join the Conversation
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Advertisement