I'm back
Thanks to elrunethe2nd, who decided to invite me back into the convo via PM.
elrunethe2nd wrote:
Better I make a big deal then keep quiet and this continues having an indefinite finish date.
I know I touched on this before, but I want to make a point here. Where did this get you last time? If I remember correctly, did you not get all immature, hot-headed, and crazy in SAX and eventually banned or something? Where did that land you? If FreeBuild hasn't made progress to your standards since the last stunt you pulled, what makes you think coming on here and complaining again is going to get you anywhere?
elrunethe2nd wrote:
I like how people aren't actually allowed to ask questions without being mobbed by the developers fans. Stand down and let me talk to the people whose opinions I actually want,
Asking questions is far different then you coming on here and complaining. One is less provocative and ignorant. And believe me, we're very open to questions on this forum.
Go back and read your original post and come back and tell me if you were asking a question or provoking. Your sarcastic, sardonic, and enticing comments are what brought this conversation to where it stands now. Don't act like you came on here throwing rose pedals on the path and we came through with a bulldozer and destroyed your little forest. That's a load of bullshit.
elrunethe2nd wrote:
and stop throwing insults, because the angrier and less objective you get, the more ridiculous you seem to me. You're waving your arms and making this a personal fight of yours when it has positively nothing to do with you.
I do it for the sport. Don't you?
Besides, was I not mentioned in the original post? I think I get some leeway to snap back, don't I?
elrunethe2nd wrote:
I don't even think you have your name in the game's credits for doing something as trivial as I did.
I'd like to think I could have a grander title over my name in the credits
At least I stirred up the development of this (without confrontation) a while ago after it had truly died down (not just slowed down) and I showed an inclination to learn C++ and purchase a license (and would have been the only one of any of us to own one) until elfprince13 came to the rescue (
).
elrunethe2nd wrote:
Don't lose sight of the point here. If you want to be a major developer of TBG and get engine access, you need to pay for it!
The developers are demanding money from people in order to let them do significant modification to the game, or is that not self explanatory! To say that, despite the fact Elfprince wants $1.50 per month (or whatnot) for engine access and then say this is not a demand for money is insane. It is denial of what was plainly said.
How am I losing sight of the point when you missed the boat all together?
Elfprince is simply the middle man for the service providing the closed repository services. You use the word 'demand' so harshly. Stop continuing to bring to our attention the fact that Elfprince is requiring $1.5/mon to forward to the company providing the service as if he was doing so unjustly. Let it go already. $1.5/mon, again, is chump-change. It's nothing. If someone is willing to purchase a license for $100 (or whatever it costs now) I'm sure they can pay a total of $18 a year for the repository service.
As a developer myself, with at least the original inclination to dive into this project, I wouldn't have skipped a beat to pay $18 to develop this. Especially if it's a project I favor. Better to pay $18 to a project I want to see flourish, then to pay the same to a project I don't care about. Again, you're not a developer. You don't know these things, and you certainly can't continue to sit here and act like you do. You're a consumer. Stop being so close-minded.
So, stop acting as if he's pocketing this money. He sees none of this money.
elrunethe2nd wrote:
Well, it affects me as part of the intended audience, and a representative of a greater audience not here today.
elrune, let's cut the bullshit. You're not the intended audience, because you don't have the credentials. If the "greater audience" isn't here to debate this, then go get them. But honestly, you're pulling shit out of your ass at this point.
elrunethe2nd wrote:
Don't play teacher with me, that is just toxic icing on an already bad cake,
Then stop eating it. You shouldn't have taken a bite in the first place. There was plenty of "good" cake over in the "How to nicely check up on a project's development by asking questions instead of enticing" isle until you poisoned it all. I just figured "Why not?" since you already did the honors.
elrunethe2nd wrote:
and a tone like that is simply trying to incite me into a rage,
Neither my intent, nor my problem. Go back and read your original post and tell me if it isn't enticing. You'd be lying through your teeth if you told me it wasn't.
elrunethe2nd wrote:
which won't work and is just you moving this thread to the ultimate goal of a lock rather than a solution.
That's what I'm waiting for.