Don't have an account? Register now to chat, post, use our tools, and much more.
Latest Headlines
Online Users
There are 121 users online: 6 members, 87 guests and 28 bots. Members: Ashbad, JosJuice, legodude, ordelore. Bots: VoilaBot (1), Spinn3r (1), MSN/Bing (1), Magpie Crawler (3), VoilaBot (1), Googlebot (19), MSN/Bing (2).
RSS & Social Media
SAX
You must log in to view the SAX chat widget
|
| Author |
Message |
|
Spyro543

Member

Joined: 17 Sep 2011 Posts: 129 Location: Ohio
|
Posted: 23 Dec 2011 11:15:31 am Post subject: The inside of a cheap calc |
|
|
My friend had a Sentry CA756, but the EXE button stopped working, and he gave it to me (but I can't fix it). These graphing calcs are about $20, with a very small screen and only 10 program spaces. Yes, 10. You reference them by using Prog, like Prog 1. It's looping capabilities are lbl, goto, ISZ, and DSZ. Sad, isn't it? And it doesn't even have a function catalog! You have to access function with a Shift- or Shift-Alpha- key sequence. To change the calc's mode, you have to press MODE, MODE-SHIFT, or MODE-ALPHA and a number. D: This thing is awful! So, without further ado, here are some pix!
Here's the awful small screen and the label that tells all the calc modes.
Sorry about this one being blurry, but here's the keyboard. As you can see, almost all of the keys have SHIFT, ALPHA, and SHIFT-ALPHA labels on them.
Here's a close-up of the arrow keys. Notice how they stole the "REPLAY" and "EXE" from Casio.
The "screenshots" on the quick reference aren't even screenshots. They didn't even attempt to make them look real.
The battery. Notice how the calc only needs one battery to work, so they just glued foam to the other contact!
This is the inside of the calc.
The main (and only) chip is, of course, buried under epoxy.
Here you can see that foamed-up battery slot also has terminals running to the circuit board, just like the other one!
The only thing holding the LCD in is the back cover pressing against it. I can freely pull it out of its slot (that is too big, the LCD can wobble all around in the slot).
Another shot of the calc, this time with the LCD flopping.
You have just witnessed how awful this cheap, $20 calc actually is. It's definitely worth less than $20  _________________ Spyro likes PICs!
http://www.microchip.com/wwwproducts/Devices.aspx?dDocName=en026331 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
KermMartian

Site Admin

Joined: 14 Mar 2005 Posts: 55763 Location: Earth, Sol, Milky Way
|
Posted: 24 Dec 2011 09:08:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
Actually, I'm moderately impressed that a $20 calculator is programmable at all. I'm a bit curious what sort of processor/memory they have under that epoxy blob, whether it's something standard or custom. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ashbad

... I think redheaded girls are kind of cool

Joined: 01 Dec 2010 Posts: 2418 Location: Stomp Stomp Stomp, The Idiot Convention
|
Posted: 24 Dec 2011 09:09:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
| KermMartian wrote: | | Actually, I'm moderately impressed that a $20 calculator is programmable at all. I'm a bit curious what sort of processor/memory they have under that epoxy blob, whether it's something standard or custom. |
I meant to post my opinion yesterday, but this is basically my verdict. I think it's definitely worth $20 considering how much an 84+ costs in comparison  _________________ -Ashbad |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
KermMartian

Site Admin

Joined: 14 Mar 2005 Posts: 55763 Location: Earth, Sol, Milky Way
|
Posted: 24 Dec 2011 09:15:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
Definitely. To expand on my wondering about what sort of hardware is lurking under that epoxy, I'm curious how much this could be hacked and expanded. If a TI calculator is already a fun challenge for hacking, this seems like it would be an even bigger and potentially therefore more rewarding challenge. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Travis
Advanced Member

Joined: 03 Feb 2011 Posts: 215 Location: Kansas, USA
|
Posted: 24 Dec 2011 07:31:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Back in the 90s, I saw a $20 programmable calc (Sharp, I think) in a catalog, but it was just scientific, not graphing. I wanted it but I later eventually settled on the TI graphing calculators I started out with, which probably eliminated my interest in the lower-level models.
I wonder if this calc is actually a rebranded Casio, given the similarity in the keys and the mode-number key sequences that many Casio scientifics used. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
KermMartian

Site Admin

Joined: 14 Mar 2005 Posts: 55763 Location: Earth, Sol, Milky Way
|
Posted: 24 Dec 2011 10:32:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Travis wrote: | Back in the 90s, I saw a $20 programmable calc (Sharp, I think) in a catalog, but it was just scientific, not graphing. I wanted it but I later eventually settled on the TI graphing calculators I started out with, which probably eliminated my interest in the lower-level models.
I wonder if this calc is actually a rebranded Casio, given the similarity in the keys and the mode-number key sequences that many Casio scientifics used. | Oh good, it's not just me. I thought that looked awefully familiar from my experiences with the Casio scientific calculators. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Snipes
Newbie

Joined: 24 Dec 2011 Posts: 6 Location: Lakewood, CO
|
Posted: 25 Dec 2011 05:46:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | I meant to post my opinion yesterday, but this is basically my verdict. I think it's definitely worth $20 considering how much an 84+ costs in comparison :) |
I hope that smiley means you're kidding. Why would you pay that much for this? But I suppose if TI calculators are the scale, then I'll go along with that statement. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ashbad

... I think redheaded girls are kind of cool

Joined: 01 Dec 2010 Posts: 2418 Location: Stomp Stomp Stomp, The Idiot Convention
|
Posted: 25 Dec 2011 08:45:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Snipes wrote: | | Quote: | I meant to post my opinion yesterday, but this is basically my verdict. I think it's definitely worth $20 considering how much an 84+ costs in comparison |
I hope that smiley means you're kidding. Why would you pay that much for this? But I suppose if TI calculators are the scale, then I'll go along with that statement. |
Smiley means happy, non-sarcastic verdict, so no, I hold to the $20 verdict This thing is a lot cheaper than alternatives, and still has many capabilities not found in similarly priced TI/Casio Scientific Calculators. $20 seems about right for a very low end 84+ replacement. _________________ -Ashbad |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
KermMartian

Site Admin

Joined: 14 Mar 2005 Posts: 55763 Location: Earth, Sol, Milky Way
|
Posted: 25 Dec 2011 12:33:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Snipes wrote: | | Quote: | I meant to post my opinion yesterday, but this is basically my verdict. I think it's definitely worth $20 considering how much an 84+ costs in comparison |
I hope that smiley means you're kidding. Why would you pay that much for this? But I suppose if TI calculators are the scale, then I'll go along with that statement. | $20 seems pretty cheap for something that can be used for arbitrary programming to me, personally.  _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Snipes
Newbie

Joined: 24 Dec 2011 Posts: 6 Location: Lakewood, CO
|
Posted: 25 Dec 2011 02:38:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | $20 seems pretty cheap for something that can be used for arbitrary programming to me, personally. |
So one man's trash is another man's treasure? Fair enough. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
KermMartian

Site Admin

Joined: 14 Mar 2005 Posts: 55763 Location: Earth, Sol, Milky Way
|
Posted: 31 Dec 2011 06:43:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Snipes wrote: | | Quote: | | $20 seems pretty cheap for something that can be used for arbitrary programming to me, personally. |
So one man's trash is another man's treasure? Fair enough. | Well, it depends on your perspective. Most computer coders would find (and do find) calculator programming laughable, but we here in the community know how to appreciate the challenge that it provides. Similarly, I see this as even more of a challenge as far as a lower-cost, lower-capability device that still somehow has cool programmability. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
willrandship

Expert

Joined: 06 Jul 2010 Posts: 558 Location: Between Venus and Mars
|
Posted: 01 Jan 2012 03:14:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'd rather get a $30 86 from amazon, or a raspberry pi but I suppose if I already had one I'd mess with it. I've heard there are ways to get epoxy blobs off of those things with the right chemicals and whatnot.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/B00000JF53/ref=dp_olp_used?ie=UTF8&qid=1325405691&sr=1-1&condition=used
I rest my case. That's a lot more powerful.
And it seems there's a steady supply. I got my 86 for $30 4 years ago, and I've never seen a change in the lower prices. None of them are in non-working condition either.
Also, the thing I find most fascinating about calc programming over computer programming is how much is known about the hardware. We know these calculators so well that we make programs that far exceed the expectations people put on things 5 times faster. That's impressive. Imagine a PC world like that. Skyrim could run on a PIII. But it really requires the hardware specialization we only see in areas like this, where asm is really the most viable language, not C. C has a tendency to hide what slows it down the most on a low level. _________________ Hmm...what to put here....
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
KermMartian

Site Admin

Joined: 14 Mar 2005 Posts: 55763 Location: Earth, Sol, Milky Way
|
Posted: 01 Jan 2012 11:25:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
Interesting, I didn't realzie that Amazon had those kinds of deals. I'm used to getting very inexpensive TI-83+s that require some repair. I wonder what they have in the way of Prizms. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Kaslai

Member

Joined: 16 Nov 2011 Posts: 172 Location: ???, WA
|
Posted: 01 Jan 2012 03:25:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| willrandship wrote: | | Also, the thing I find most fascinating about calc programming over computer programming is how much is known about the hardware. We know these calculators so well that we make programs that far exceed the expectations people put on things 5 times faster. That's impressive. Imagine a PC world like that. Skyrim could run on a PIII. But it really requires the hardware specialization we only see in areas like this, where asm is really the most viable language, not C. C has a tendency to hide what slows it down the most on a low level. |
This is also the reason why console games can run quite fast even with the often meager specs of the system. The people who write the libraries and compiler for the console have a single target. Thus, there are far fewer layers of abstraction and the code created can be very close to the hardware.
While it is true that hand optimized assembly will almost always be faster than equivalent C code, it's often the libraries that slow things down, and there are quite a few cases in Windows where a function calls a function that calls another function, memory is read to see what other functions it should branch to for compatibility, etc. On an integrated system, a lot of it is cut out because there will only be one specific set of hardware running this code, so all of those checks are wholly unnecessary.
Anyways, on topic: That calculator doesn't look at all shabby for $20. I wonder why schools don't get these on the cheap instead of expensive TI-84's or even worse... TI-nspires! _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
willrandship

Expert

Joined: 06 Jul 2010 Posts: 558 Location: Between Venus and Mars
|
Posted: 01 Jan 2012 07:58:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
My school doesn't get ripped off at all. They rent calcs out for $30 a trimester, so their investments are paid off in under 2 years. And those calcs are a lot more than 2 years old, most of them are 82s. It's nice to see the school being smart about products. They seem to be on a smartboard kick, though. _________________ Hmm...what to put here....
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Register to Join the Conversation
Have your own thoughts to add to this or any other topic? Want to ask a question, offer a suggestion, share your own programs and projects, upload a file to the file archives, get help with calculator and computer programming, or simply chat with like-minded coders and tech and calculator enthusiasts via the site-wide AJAX SAX widget? Registration for a free Cemetech account only takes a minute.
» Go to Registration page
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
© Copyright 2000-2013 Cemetech & Kerm Martian :: Page Execution Time: 0.038359 seconds.
|